Thursday, 24 July 2025 07:55

Editorial: The Government must come clean

Written by  Staff Reporters
The Sustainable Finance Taxonomy is being developed by the Centre for Sustainable Finance and the Ministry for the Environment. The Sustainable Finance Taxonomy is being developed by the Centre for Sustainable Finance and the Ministry for the Environment.

OPINION: For most farmers and readers, the term Sustainable Finance Taxonomy will make little sense.

But if Federated Farmers and Groundswell are to be believed, then the 'green' finance rules being devised by the Government risk doing real harm to rural communities.

The Sustainable Finance Taxonomy is being developed by the Centre for Sustainable Finance and the Ministry for the Environment to provide a consistent framework for defining what is 'green' or 'sustainable' in financial markets.

Federated Farmers says it would create major risks for New Zealand's agricultural sector and is urging the Government to halt the process entirely.

One of their core concerns is the lack of practical farming expertise involved in developing the taxonomy - there are no hands-on farmers involved with the Technical Advisory Group. Instead, it's full of shiny-shoed bankers, sustainability advisors, and forestry lobbyists, according to Feds.

In a letter sent to Ministers and key officials on July 11, Federated Farmers outlined a series of serious concerns with the Sustainable Finance Taxonomy.

Groundswell, which is keeping pressure on the Government to withdraw from the Paris climate change pact, claims under the taxonomy proposal, all farms would be classified as green, amber or red. If a farm is classified red, it is unable to align with Paris 1.5 degree and in the words of the proposal "the only way... is for them to be phased out".

The Government must come out and explain the NZ Taxonomy proposal.

Some farmers want the Government to disband the taxonomy process entirely, warning it will do more harm than good.

Critics believe that this isn't a path to sustainable finance. If their claims are right, that it is ideologically driven and practically unworkable, it risks serious harm to rural New Zealand.

More like this

Is the Coalition Government Really Backing Farmers?

OPINION: Many sheep and beef farmers will be worse off under the new environment legislation than they were under the Resource Management Act (RMA), claims Beef+Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) in an email to levy payers.

Editorial: RMA reforms uproar

OPINION: The euphoria over the Government’s two new bills to replace the broken Resource Management Act is over.

Editorial: Having a rural voice

OPINION: The past few weeks have been tough on farms across the North Island: floods and storms have caused damage and disruption to families and businesses.

Featured

Cresslands Stud's Century of Change

The subdivision and sale of the Rangiora's Coldstream Estate in 1921 was advantageous for not one, but four Cantebury families - but one in particular has become synonymous with outstanding Holstein Friesian cattle.

Editorial: Live Exports Dead in the Water

OPINION: Public opinion, political pragmatism and commercial and market reality have caused the Government to abandon introducing legislation into Parliament to legalise the shipment by sea of live animals - mainly cows - to overseas destinations.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Happy Days

OPINION: The good news keeps getting better for NZ dairy farmers.

Begging Bowl

OPINION: With export of livestock by sea dead in the water, opponents of the Gene Technology Bill think they can…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter