Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:45

Effluent code snag

Written by 

The dairy industry is working hard but struggling to implement its much-heralded effluent code of practice and design standards, says irrigation industry stalwart Stuart Reid.

He says he meets farmers who incorrectly perceive the standards as "bells and whistles", and who may therefore ask designers for a lower level of design.

Reid says the code, unless completely accepted by farmers, and particularly implemented at regional council level, could "sit on the shelf gathering dust" and be infrequently used.

"We now have excellent standards, but voluntary uptake is undermining the intention to get everybody in step. That's a shame," he told Dairy News.

But Irrigation New Zealand chief executive Andrew Curtis believes it's a bit "early for doom and gloom merchants" to start jumping on a scheme that is well received by the industry, councils, milk supply companies and farmers.

The scheme has been live only since February 27, now has five accredited companies and we're already seeing strong support, he says.

"A number of companies have contacted us expressing an interest in working through the next round of the accreditation programme, with applications due June 1. There is also strong interest from farmers in effluent system design accreditation. DairyNZ and Irrigation New Zealand have spoken with farmers about it at effluent expos in Christchurch and Hamilton.

"Farmers are looking for 'safe hands' when designing systems and the system gives them confidence those companies who have passed through it are capable designers. The accredited companies have gone through a rigorous assessment process and committed to providing quality designs for farmers."

The standard, and the code of practice, approved after two years development by representatives of the dairy and effluent services industries, and regional councils, provide criteria for measuring the adequacy of farm dairy effluent systems. The code guides designers in developing effluent systems fit for purpose.

But though industry stakeholders are committed to implementing the new standards, farmers are not legally required to.

Reid says a big problem of this voluntary aspect is that design companies will 'feel the heat' to drop their standards just to get a contract.

"If a farmer says he doesn't want to go through 'all that palaver', and wants only the barest minimum, then the supplier comes under pressure to provide this minimum-and-far from-desirable level of design so as not to lose the job to someone else.

"There will be huge temptation to compromise our intended good practice just to get the account. Yes, the farmer probably now takes responsibility for choosing the shortcuts, but the designer may go along with him just to get the money. If this happens the integrity of standards will been undermined."

The failure of regional councils to endorse the standards is also a nuisance, Reid says. Presently, each council has its own set of effluent management rules with wide differences. Nationwide adoption of the industry standards would give clarity and direction.

"At present many Taranaki farmers can put all their mostly treated effluent into a stream at low cost, while in Southland the same farmer has to stand up to intense scrutiny. There is an unfair 'cost of farming' advantage to the Taranaki bloke – a penalty to the Southlander."

Reid says councils should consider the standards a "godsend". They've been rescued from the "regulation" dilemma, he says.

"Farmers often accuse councils of being good at telling them what they can't do, and they accuse them of being not so hot at telling them what they ought to do. Now the dairy industry itself has set its own high standards, why shouldn't the council direct them and expect them to meet and live up to them.  It even saves them from going down the path of regulation."

More like this

Bigger pond means lower risk

On the need for water: don’t you wish you had a bit more water to keep pasture alive? Were you one of those farmers who strove to build an effluent pond of minimum size, and so missed out on having extra water in this year’s dry season? 

Featured

Dr Mike Joy says sorry, escapes censure

Academic Dr Mike Joy and his employer, Victoria University of Wellington have apologised for his comments suggesting that dairy industry CEOs should be hanged for contributing towards nitrate poisoning of waterways.

People-first philosophy pays off

The team meeting at the Culverden Hotel was relaxed and open, despite being in the middle of calving when stress levels are at peak levels, especially in bitterly cold and wet conditions like today.

Farmer anger over Joy's social media post

A comment by outspoken academic Dr Mike Joy suggesting that dairy industry leaders should be hanged for nitrate contamination of drinking/groundwater has enraged farmers.

From Nelson to Dairy Research: Amy Toughey’s Journey

Driven by a lifelong passion for animals, Amy Toughey's journey from juggling three jobs with full-time study to working on cutting-edge dairy research trials shows what happens when hard work meets opportunity - and she's only just getting started.

National

Machinery & Products

JDLink Boost for NZ farms

Connectivity is widely recognised as one of the biggest challenges facing farmers, but it is now being overcome through the…

New generation Defender HD11

The all-new 2026 Can-Am Defender HD11 looks likely to raise the bar in the highly competitive side-by-side category.

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Buttery prize

OPINION: Westland Milk may have won the contract to supply butter to Costco NZ but Open Country Dairy is having…

Gene Bill rumours

OPINION: The Gene Technology Bill has divided the farming community with strong arguments on both the pros and cons of…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter