Wednesday, 20 January 2021 09:55

Work with WorkSafe or face the music

Written by  Jessica Marshall
WorkSafe is reminding farmers to comply with inspectors or run the risk of enforcement action. WorkSafe is reminding farmers to comply with inspectors or run the risk of enforcement action.

WorkSafe is reminding business owners that they must work with their inspectors or run the risk of enforcement action.

The comment follows the conviction of Manawatu dairy farmer Daniel Reuel Sproull, who entered no plea to two charges under Section 176 of the Health and Safety at Work Act, and a deemed not guilty plea was entered by the court at a pre-trial hearing.

Sproull was convicted on both charges at the Palmerston North District Court and fined $4,000 for preventing inspectors from accessing his property and failing to attend or make alternative arrangements to complete a required interview at WorkSafe’s offices.

WorkSafe Area Manager Danielle Henry says the incident occurred in November 2018 when WorkSafe inspectors met with farmers across Palmerston North to help educate and upskill them about hazardous substances. As part of this work, inspectors visited Sproull’s property on multiple occasions.

He refused the inspectors entry onto the site without proof of proper authority to do so. He was shown WorkSafe identification cards by inspectors but did not accept these as proof of their appointments and turned the inspectors away.

He was then provided further confirmation but still refused to assist them or allow him onto his property. In one instance, he blocked access to areas of his business and failed to attend a required interview.

During sentencing, the judge confirmed that he found the behaviour to be deliberately obstructive.

Sproull was ordered to pay a contribution to the prosecution’s legal costs totalling more than $4,000.

Henry says under the Health and Safety at Work Act, all reasonable assistance must be given to WorkSafe inspectors who are entering or inspecting a site.

She says there was no indication or belief at the time of the incident that Sproull had breached the Act.

“Our inspectors simply wanted to ensure Sproull knew how to keep workers safe when working with or storing hazardous substances,” she says.

Henry says that Sproull’s unlawful prevention of the inspectors’ entry to the site left WorkSafe with no option but to prosecute.

“Our education work is critical to lifting health and safety performance and deliberately obstructing our inspectors from carrying out their work at any time makes no sense at all.”

More like this


Arla eyeing $1b online sales

European cooperative Arla is fast tracking plans to become the trading bloc’s dairy market leader for e-commerce as more consumers…

DairyNZ sets the record straight

DairyNZ has launched a major public information programme to give farmers an accurate assessment of the Climate Change Commissions report…

Dairy's golden run continues

Global dairy prices have continued their golden run, with the Global Dairy Trade auction recording its seventh consecutive rise in…

» The RNG Weather Report

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Bad Week

OPINION: It's been a bad week for Fonterra. 

Nothing beats milk

OPINION: Immune system support and disease prevention are top of mind for Americans stuck at home during Covid lockdowns and…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter