Costs too high?
OPINION: This old mutt is loath to sound like Groundswell has been topping up his bowl with brisket off-cuts, but the ginger group makes a good point about the arguments raised in favour of toeing the Paris Agreement line.
At least 36 signs have been ordered by farmers and landowners with properties along State Highway One in the South Island.
Signs are also going up on State Highways Two and Three in the North Island.
Groundswell leader Bryce McKenzie says that while National is getting "irritated" by their campaign, Groundswell is getting a sympathetic hearing from the coalition partners, NZ First and ACT.
He believes the Quit Paris campaign will become one of the major issues at the next general election.
"We are talking to some parties about it and I'm pretty sure they will take a stand closer to the general election," he told Rural News.
ACT agriculture spokesman Mark Cameron says the rural communities need to know where their leaders stand on the issue.
"As the pressure mounts on politicians to mark where the Paris Accord sits, especially as dissent grows, where will our leaders fall?"
Cameron notes that political abstention will hurt both sides of this important debate.
"As both sides need an answer founded in science, economic outcomes, and opportunities - devoid of hyperbole and catastrophic overtures.
"I'd suggest, those with political nous should genuinely consider the 'leave' versus stay argument. I would suggest in that moment that both are genuinely costed. This way rural NZ knows exactly where they and the country land," he told Rural News.
McKenzie blasted National for its stance of Paris.
At the Primary Industries Summit in Christchurch last month, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay said that leaving the Paris Agreement would be madness.
He warned that other countries would use that to block our exports and clear our products from their supermarket shelves.
"There would be consequences, whether you believe in climate change or not, because the world does not owe New Zealand a living," says McClay.
McKenzie says he doesn't know what McClay is basing his statements on.
"They have done no costings: the Government claims our products will be removed from supermarket shelves," he says.
"I thought the world wants lower emission food and the food we produce has the lowest emissions profile in the world. If they remove our food products, where will the new products come from?"
