Tuesday, 20 December 2011 15:05

TAF update? What update?

Written by 

FONTERRA IS on the slippery slope towards demutualisation and a board “update” on the cause, the Trading Among Farmers proposal, yet again failed to recognise this, says one of a growing number of shareholders calling for a second vote on the proposal.

South Canterbury dairy farmer Leonie Guiney is one of several shareholders who, after seeking expert legal advice, says the current proposal will see farmer control undermined.

Fonterra’s Sky TV broadcast on Friday (December 16) “had no update in it” and while “it’s positive Fonterra has acknowledged farmers have an issue with the shareholders fund structure,” Guiney says that acknowledgement has only come as a result of grassroots shareholders exposing the threat TAF presents.

“What we’ve discovered is that the locked box is in fact an empty box. The asset was sitting on the trust balance sheet in the proposal all along, completely compromising the commitment of 100% farmer ownership and control.”

For nearly two years, Fonterra’s board and management have been saying the TAF proposal will retain 100% farmer owner and control, but with the asset corresponding to shares showing on the unit trust’s balance sheet, unit holders, ie outside investors, would have legal rights under company and trust law to expect trust managers to act in their best interests. In effect that would be to maximise dividend, and minimise milk price, explains Guiney.

“Now we have been told they [Fonterra management] have three more options, the detail of which they are working on, and one of them is leaving the current proposal as is!

“How can Sir Henry keep repeating ad nauseam the line about 100% ownership and control and leave the current proposal on the table?”

Assurances shareholders ‘will be informed in due time’ from Fonterra’s board also ring hollow, she says.

“How many times have we heard this? How much closer is this to being pushed through parliament?

“But the biggest question of all is this – at what point did our cooperative’s purpose shift from looking after the interests of its co-op members and owners to looking after the interests of future investors in the NZX , including the NZ Govt?

“How do we halt this no longer subtle move towards demutualisation of our cooperative? How do we as the producers of the milk protect future generations of milk producers against the short-term gain mentality of those who would prefer to trade?”

Guiney is also concerned at how the issue is being reported in certain media outlets, given NZX would be likely to benefit from a demutualisation of Fonterra.

“Remember, NZX now owns both NZ Dairy Exporter and Farmers Weekly.”

Suggestions in the latter, December 19, that 4% dry shares in Fonterra as of July 2011 ‘is one measure of farmers’ appetite to expose themselves to non production linked share ownership and dividend income’ also grate.

“To me 4% looks like a very poor appetite and is in reality just a reflection of the expected  fluctuation in milk production due to normal climatic variation, possibly plus a little headroom on farms that anticipate expanding output...

“We have no appetite for ‘non production linked share ownership’ and see it as the biggest risk to the future of our milk price and cooperative.”

A Fonterra spokesman re-iterated to Rural News that the Board, Shareholders’ Council and Management remain totally committed to 100% farmer ownership and control, and they are in regular contact with shareholders about TAF and getting their feedback.

“This will continue into the New Year and we have advised our farmers that there will be a round of farmer meetings from Jan 31 – Feb 3.”

More like this

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

Editorial: A new era for two co-ops

OPINION: Farmer shareholders of two of New Zealand's largest co-operatives have an important decision to make this month and what they decide could change the landscape of the dairy and meat sectors in New Zealand.

Should co-op sell its consumer brands?

OPINION: As CEO of the Dairy Board in the 1980s I was fortunate to work with a team of experienced and capable executives who made most of the brand investments that created the international consumer business Fonterra inherited. Soprole in Chile was the largest, but there were more than 20 countries where consumer marketing companies were established and Anchor and other brands were successfully launched.

Featured

'One more push' to eliminate FE

Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) is calling on farmers from all regions to take part in the final season of the Sheep Poo Study aiming to build a clearer picture of how facial eczema (FE) affects farms across New Zealand.

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

National

Machinery & Products

New McHale terra drive axle option

Well-known for its Fusion baler wrapper combination, Irish manufacturer McHale has launched an interesting option at the recent Irish Ploughing…

Amazone unveils flagship spreader

With the price of fertiliser still significantly higher than 2024, there is an increased onus on ensuring its spread accurately at…

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Tough times

OPINION: Dairy industry players are also falling by the wayside as the economic downturn bites around the country.

MSA triumph

OPINION: Methane Science Accord, a farmer-led organisation advocating for zero tax on ruminant methane, will be quietly celebrating its first…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter