Friday, 03 February 2012 10:39

Farmers want TAF- van der Heyden

Written by 

Fonterra farmers want the co-op to get on with TAF (trading among farmers), says chairman Henry van der Heyden.

Speaking to Rural News yesterday van der Heyden says farmers have been given three options on the custodian holding legal title to traded shares.

Van der Heyden, who attended seven farmer meetings last week, is confident farmers will accept the co-op's preferred option. However, he says it's up to farmers to make the choice.

"At the end of the meetings I have attended, a vast majority of farmers are telling us to just get on with it."

Van der Heyden says farmers have been asked to give feedback online this month.

"We have left it up to our farmers to decide which option they prefer."

He says the mood in the meetings have been positive and turnout has been one of the biggest since the co-op's formation. However, farmers are angry with the Government's proposed changes to raw milk regulations and half the time at the meetings was spent on the issue.

Despite the outcry over DIRA, he believes farmers remain positive about TAF and he expects it to be launched in November.

The co-op is recommending a farmer-controlled trust to hold traded shares in a bid to appease shareholders, who fear losing 100% control.

In 50 shareholder meetings around the country this week, Fonterra board and management presented three options, designed to allay fears that legal title of shares placed in the Fonterra Shareholders Fund will be transferred to a custodian not in farmer control. Shares swapped among Fonterra shareholders under TAF (trading among farmers) will be placed in the fund.

Fonterra says its preferred option will give farmers "the comfort of direct control and ownership of the custodian". The preferred option includes a Farmer Trust Custodian owned by a trust controlled directly by farmer shareholders. The other options are a custodian 100% owned by Fonterra and individual farmer retaining legal title to shares they place with the fund.

Fonterra farmers were told they will collectively retain legal title to shares placed with the fund without additional layers of administration that would potentially make TAF too complicated to work effectively.

In contrast, keeping legal title with farmers carries significant downside risk because of its complexities and potential for value destruction, it says.

"For example, keeping track of share ownership in the event that a farmer shareholder passes away would become very complicated if their shares are dispersed among children and other beneficiaries to a will.

"The more complicated TAF becomes, the greater the need for detailed explanations as to why TAF needs to be so different to other investment opportunities," farmers were told.

Fonterra was forced back to the drawing board after shareholders expressed concern at legal title of shares ending up with the custodian. At its annual meeting in November, Fonterra chief executive Theo Spierings announced management was taking a fresh look at legal title to shares placed with the fund.

The co-op says the custodian approach is a straight forward solution that would achieve TAF objectives. "Let's be clear: the custodian is not a person, it's not an entity, and it's not a decision-making body that holds meetings. It is purely a mechanism to hold legal title to shares for the benefit of farmer-shareholders," it says.

Fonterra admits it did not explain the custodian as well as it should have in the past.

"But the reality is that the custodian is 100% controlled and owned by Fonterra, and Fonterra is owned by farmers. However, it's not enough for the board to be comfortable about this. Farmer shareholders need to be as well."

More like this

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

Editorial: A new era for two co-ops

OPINION: Farmer shareholders of two of New Zealand's largest co-operatives have an important decision to make this month and what they decide could change the landscape of the dairy and meat sectors in New Zealand.

Should co-op sell its consumer brands?

OPINION: As CEO of the Dairy Board in the 1980s I was fortunate to work with a team of experienced and capable executives who made most of the brand investments that created the international consumer business Fonterra inherited. Soprole in Chile was the largest, but there were more than 20 countries where consumer marketing companies were established and Anchor and other brands were successfully launched.

Featured

'One more push' to eliminate FE

Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) is calling on farmers from all regions to take part in the final season of the Sheep Poo Study aiming to build a clearer picture of how facial eczema (FE) affects farms across New Zealand.

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

National

Machinery & Products

New McHale terra drive axle option

Well-known for its Fusion baler wrapper combination, Irish manufacturer McHale has launched an interesting option at the recent Irish Ploughing…

Amazone unveils flagship spreader

With the price of fertiliser still significantly higher than 2024, there is an increased onus on ensuring its spread accurately at…

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Tough times

OPINION: Dairy industry players are also falling by the wayside as the economic downturn bites around the country.

MSA triumph

OPINION: Methane Science Accord, a farmer-led organisation advocating for zero tax on ruminant methane, will be quietly celebrating its first…

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter