Wednesday, 06 July 2016 06:25

Tyranny of the minority — Editorial

Written by 

The Silver Fern Farms/Shanghai Maling joint venture proposal is getting nastier the longer it drags out.

The drama is not helped by the company's often off-hand dismissal of some shareholders' concerns about the deal and recent delay in getting Overseas Investment Office approval for the deal to be finalised.

Until OIO and the relevant ministers decide, the process is stalled in a vacuum swirling with rumour and innuendo. The longer this plays out the more conspiracy theories and wild claims will be made by the dissidents.

Clearly a minority group of disgruntled shareholders, in cahoots with NZ First, are determined to overturn the deal at all costs, arguing that their concerns centre purely on process and legal aspects. In fact they just don't like it, but they lack the intestinal fortitude and courage of their convictions to say this outright.

Reports by the Financial Markets Authority and the Companies Office, over the validity of the Silver Fern Farms resolution process and its directors' actions , should have dispelled these disgruntled shareholders' case but, like political blowhards in New Zealand First, they dismiss these investigations as not having produced the result they wanted.

The blistering arrogance of this small minority underlies their mistaken belief in a right to overturn the wishes of the overwhelming majority of SFF shareholders – the 82% (at least) who bothered to vote last October in favour of the joint venture.

More proof of the depths this disgruntled minority will dive to is seen in their putting about unattributed, unidentified media claims out of Australia that Shanghai Maling wants to pull out of the deal. This is the same kind of 'reputable' Australian media scuttlebutt that falsely claimed a few weeks ago that Fonterra was showing Theo Spierings the door.

SFF and Shanghai Maling insist they are committed to this venture and so it seems are the silent majority of SFF shareholders. It is time the majority told the vocal minority, in no uncertain terms, to pack up their tents and get out of the company if they are so unhappy.

Should OIO and ministerial approval be granted, the board of SFF would have no option but to honour the contract with Shanghai Maling, provided all agreed contractual obligations are met. The risk of not doing so would cost SFF and its shareholders a lot of money and you can guarantee the disaffected 5% wouldn't stump up with costs.

More like this

Featured

Contract milkers hit hard by drought crisis

Many contract milkers in badly drought affected regions around the country are coming under severe financial stress and farm owners are being urged to help them through a bad patch until the start of the new season.

National

Helping protect sheep from parasites

Everyone from experienced veterinarians and young professionals to the Wormwise programme and outstanding clinics have been recognised in this year’s…

Machinery & Products

Farmer-led group buys Novag

While the name and technology remain unchanged and new machines will continue to carry the Novag name, all the assets,…

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Make it 1000%!

OPINION: The appendage swinging contest between the US and China continues, with China hitting back with a new rate of…

Own goal

OPINION: The irony of President Trump’s tariff obsession is that the worst damage may be done to his own people.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter