Wednesday, 10 September 2025 10:55

Editorial: Changes to Paris deal

Written by  Staff Reporters
David Seymour (centre) with ACT MPs Andrew Hoggard (left) and Mark Cameron. David Seymour (centre) with ACT MPs Andrew Hoggard (left) and Mark Cameron.

OPINION: Everyone wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die.

That's the line Deputy Prime Minister and ACT leader David Seymour used on a windy South Auckland dairy farm as he launched his party's position on climate change.

For so long, NZ's mighty hydro lakes and geothermal wells let New Zealanders have it both ways.

"We could go to heaven for having low emissions, but we didn't have to die by having the lights go out. Unfortunately, that golden age of easy choices is over," Seymour says.

ACT is taking a middle ground approach to the Paris Agreement - it's not advocating for leaving the climate change pact, not yet anyway.

It is demanding changes, failing which, we exit the deal, adopted in the French capital in 2015.

New Zealand's 2050 climate target of cutting methane emissions by 24 to 47% of 2017 levels was set by the previous Labour government.


Read More:


The current Government is being urged by farmer lobby groups to lower the target, and back away from any plans to put a price on methane. A scientific panel, appointed by National, found cutting methane 14-24% of 2017 levels by 2050 would achieve no added warming, but Cabinet has not said whether it will adopt that range as a target.

By seeking changes, ACT is seeking a better deal for farmers - meaning a fairer, more scientific approach to methane.

It has never made sense to treat cow burps the same way as emissions from coal-burning.

The farming community is warming to ACT's potion.

The problem may not be the Paris Agreement itself, but how it's being applied in New Zealand that is hurting farmers and rural communities. Overly ambitious methane reduction targets, whole-farm conversions to carbon forestry, and plans to price agricultural emissions are all homegrown policies.

While not everyone may be willing to put the 'Quit Paris' sticker on their car bumper, they agree on one thing - changes are needed.

More like this

Costs too high?

OPINION: This old mutt is loath to sound like Groundswell has been topping up his bowl with brisket off-cuts, but the ginger group makes a good point about the arguments raised in favour of toeing the Paris Agreement line.

Paris Agreement - in or out?

OPINION: Defenders of New Zealand remaining bound to the Paris Agreement typically run the same argument. They do not explain the benefits of remaining bound to Paris, because there are none. At least none that are certain and enduring.

Featured

Meet the Need: Helping Kiwis put food on the table

Meet the Need, a farmer-led charity, says food insecurity in New Zealand is dire, with one in four children now living in a household experiencing food insecurity, according to Ministry of Health data.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Red faced

OPINION: The Greens have taken the high moral ground on the Palestine issue and been leading political agitators in related…

Cold comfort

One of the most galling aspects of the tariffs whacked on our farm exports to the US is the fact…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter