Wednesday, 05 April 2017 12:55

Report misses critical point – Guy

Written by  Pam Tipa
Ballance Environmental farmer of the Year Richard Kidd, with Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy who planted a kauri on Kidd’s farm. Ballance Environmental farmer of the Year Richard Kidd, with Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy who planted a kauri on Kidd’s farm.

An OECD report missed a critical point in claiming NZ is reaching its environmental limits and criticising the government’s primary export targets.

So says Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy.

The critical thing they missed is the government’s target of doubling the value – not the volume -- of primary exports by 2025, Guy says.

“There is no way we can increase our dairy cow numbers from 5 million to 10 million – we can’t do that,” he explained. “There is no way we can catch twice the amount of fish in our oceans. [The aim is] value creation.”

Guy says he met the people writing the report last year, when they visited MPI staff. They then wrote a report challenging the primary sector.

“Yes we do have challenges…. We will work constructively with regional councils on a catchment by catchment basis,” he says. “We will look at the challenges in Waikato, and in the rivers in Canterbury…. we need to get the limits set right.”

Water quality is important foraNZ, hence the government’s policy of making our rivers swimmable by 2040, he says.

“Currently 72% are swimmable; we’ve made a target of 90% and we know that will be a stretch. We will talk to farmers about managing E.coli; that will require fencing about 56,000km alongside waterways.”

Dairy and other farms have come a long way voluntarily. The dairy industry has fenced 24,000km of waterways to exclude livestock. “A lot of those have riparian planting done voluntarily over about a decade.”

Now MPI is talking to red meat, beef, deer and pig farmers, Guy says. This will cost about $370m over the next 13 years, some $200 million of that for water reticulation on farms. Farmers fencing cattle out of rivers and streams will have to tap into streams or springs to supply tanks and troughs.

A recent MPI report on water supply on hill country farms shows the cost of water reticulation is recouped over three years.

“You don’t get good grazing performance on hill country unless you put crops in strategic places and then you have the opportunity to lift your overall productivity,” Guy says.

More like this

How farmers make spring count

OPINION: Spring is a critical season for farmers – a time when the right decisions can set the tone for productivity and profitability throughout the year.

Featured

All eyes on NZ milk supply

All eyes are on milk production in New Zealand and its impact on global dairy prices in the coming months.

National

Machinery & Products

Tech might take time

Agritech Unleashed – a one-day event held recently at Mystery Creek, near Hamilton – focused on technology as an ‘enabler’…

John Deere acquires GUSS Automation

John Deere has announced the full acquisition of GUSS Automation, LLC, a globally recognised leader in supervised high-value crop autonomy,…

Fencing excellence celebrated

The Fencing Contractors Association of New Zealand (FCANZ) celebrated the best of the best at the 2025 Fencing Industry Awards,…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

A step too far

OPINION: For years, the ironically named Dr Mike Joy has used his position at Victoria University to wage an activist-style…

Save us from SAFE

OPINION: A mate of yours truly has had an absolute gutsful of the activist group SAFE.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter