Thursday, 19 December 2024 09:55

Pricing ag emissions 'is wrong'

Written by  Peter Burke
Red meat farmers want the Government to consider alternatives to emissions pricing. Red meat farmers want the Government to consider alternatives to emissions pricing.

 Pricing agricultural emissions is wrong and there are better ways, says chair of Beef + Lamb NZ Kate Acland.

A report commissioned by B+LNZ shows that New Zealand is out of step with global climate policies. The report produced by New Zealander Macauly Jones, an independent agricultural and sustainability consultant based in Berlin, surveyed sixteen jurisdictions internationally to see how they are dealing with reducing agricultural emissions.

Acland says only one other country besides NZ - Denmark - is considering pricing agricultural emissions and their scheme is heavily subsidised.

She says B+LNZ is not saying that it doesn't have a part to play in reducing agricultural emissions, but says she wants the Government to consider alternatives to pricing. She says there is also a myth that agriculturer is being let off the hook by excluding ruminant emissions from the ETS.

"This report is about prompting the conversation that there is a better way and that we need to reconsider how we are looking at the best way to address agricultural emissions. All pricing will achieve is a further reduction in stock numbers and that's a worry," she says.

Acland says the report shows that there are examples of other countries around the world who are addressing their agricultural emissions in a better way.

Meanwhile, the issue of agricultural emissions was in the spotlight this month with a two-day agricultural and climate change conference in Wellington. This attracted more than 400 people - a mixture of scientists, politicians, policy makers and others.

Among the keynote speakers was Agriculture Minister Todd McClay who reiterated that his government is committed to farming - noting that this was why they took agriculture out of the ETS. He says it makes no sense to have a punitive tax that says farmers must change emissions on farm.

McClay says there hasd been significant investment in finding solutions for climate change mitigation.

"Those investments are coming out of the laboratory and being tested around the world and in NZ, and over the years I think these will become available. The approach we are taking is not to tax farmers, which will see less food produced. Rather, we want to collaborate with them and find technological innovations that mean NZ gets to lead the world in food production. We are not about closing farms," he says. 

As regards setting up a pricing system for agriculture by 2030, McClay to some degree played this down, saying any consideration of a price would be done later on after many other things are done, and the bottom line was they would not send jobs and production overseas.

More like this

Farmers want certainty

OPINION: We've been having constructive conversations with the Government recently around climate change and emissions from food production, but now is the time to see these conversations turn into action.

Featured

Farmers urged not to be complacent about TB

New Zealand's TBfree programme has made great progress in reducing the impact of the disease on livestock herds, but there’s still a long way to go, according to Beef+Lamb NZ.

Editorial: Making wool great again

OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.

National

Machinery & Products

Farmer-led group buys Novag

While the name and technology remain unchanged and new machines will continue to carry the Novag name, all the assets,…

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Make it 1000%!

OPINION: The appendage swinging contest between the US and China continues, with China hitting back with a new rate of…

Own goal

OPINION: The irony of President Trump’s tariff obsession is that the worst damage may be done to his own people.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter