Tuesday, 03 July 2012 10:02

ETS 'still harsh': Feds

Written by 

The New Zealand Emissions Trading scheme (ETS) has taken a big step towards forward, yet remains the harshest treatment of any agricultural production system on Earth.

"The Government realises even tougher measures would hurt not just agriculture but the wider economy," says Dr William Rolleston, Federated Farmers vice-president and climate change spokesperson.

"Both our chief executive, Conor English, at the Rio+20 Earth Summit and our president, Bruce Wills, at the World Farmers Organisation, got the same message; targeting primary food production in ETS-type policies is anathema to sustainable primary food production.

"In a world preoccupied with the survival of their economies and with food security, there is no point in trying to lead where others will not follow.

"Yes biological emissions account for some 47% of New Zealand's emissions profile. They also represent 68.1% of our merchandise exports and indeed, 100% of the food we eat.

"New Zealand is able to not only feed itself, but produces enough food to feed populations equivalent of Sri Lanka.

"This is why it is positive the Government has listened to Federated Farmers and will keep agricultural biological emissions out of the ETS until at least 2015.

"We have retained the one-for-two surrender obligation we asked for, along with the $25 fixed price option. Federated Farmers also wanted offsetting for pre-1990 forests and opposed the reduction of pre-1990 forest allocations. The Government has listened to that too, but those who do offset will be penalised.

"We are pleased the Government has chosen not to further complicate matters by imposing additional restrictions on the importation of overseas emissions units.

"Despite what some Opposition parties are likely to say following these changes, our ETS remains the harshest on any agricultural production system, anywhere in the world.

"Unlike other countries where agriculture is given special treatment, farmers here, just like every other business and family, pay the ETS on the fuel and energy we use. This not only impacts a farm's bottom line, but the cost of turning what we produce into finished goods for export.

"Australia's new Carbon Tax is really aimed at Australia's 300 largest companies. Meanwhile, Australian farmers are being financially rewarded for boosting soil carbon levels on-farm.

"Since 1 January, all agricultural processors in New Zealand have been filing emission returns accounting for agricultural biological emissions. We are still counting emissions no other government is contemplating, including our cousins across the Tasman.

"While agriculture emissions here grew 9.4% between 1990 and 2010, the dollar value these generated for NZ Inc exploded almost five-fold. Our sector's emission growth needs to be put into context alongside a 59% increase in electricity emissions and 60% for transport.

"What's more former Labour Cabinet Minister, the David Caygill, found emissions in every single unit of agricultural product have fallen some 1.3% each year, for the past 20 years.

"We do not need an ETS to improve our productivity. Global competition has done that for us.

"That New Zealand's farmers are among the world's most carbon efficient, is an inconvenient truth New Zealanders are not hearing from Opposition politicians.

"We can do more but that will be through productivity gains and research leadership exemplified by the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases.

"In a world of increasing food deficit, our hope is for Opposition parties to realise being a carbon efficient food exporter is global leadership," Rolleston concluded.

More like this

Working with farmers to ensure best outcomes

OPINION: Recent media commentary from Southland Federated Farmers has raised concerns among our rural communities, particularly around Environment Southland’s approach to winter grazing inspections and nitrogen reporting. But let’s be clear, much of what’s been said simply doesn’t reflect reality.

Editorial: Nitrate emergency?

OPINION: Environment Canterbury's (ECan) decision recently to declare a so-called “nitrate emergency” is laughable.

Federated Farmers slam Canterbury nitrate emergency

A shameless political stunt is how Federated Farmers is describing the Canterbury Regional Council decision to declare “a nitrate emergency” on the back of its latest annual groundwater quality survey.

Featured

Editorial: Credit where it's due

OPINION: While farmers are busy and diligently doing their best to deal with unwanted gasses, the opponents of farming - namely the Greens and their mates - are busy polluting the atmosphere with tirades of hot air about what farmers supposedly aren't doing.

Farmers Lead Sustainability Push: Woodchip bioreactor cuts nitrate runoff in Manawatu

Claims that farmers are polluters of waterways and aquifers and 'don't care' still ring out from environmental groups and individuals. The phrase 'dirty dairying' continues to surface from time to time. But as reporter Peter Burke points out, quite the opposite is the case. He says, quietly and behind the scenes, farmers are embracing new ideas and technologies to make their farms sustainable, resilient, environmentally friendly and profitable.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Red faced

OPINION: The Greens have taken the high moral ground on the Palestine issue and been leading political agitators in related…

Cold comfort

One of the most galling aspects of the tariffs whacked on our farm exports to the US is the fact…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter