Fonterra trims board size
Fonterra’s board has been reduced to nine - comprising six farmer-elected and three appointed directors.
OPINION: Fonterra farmers have delivered a stinging rebuke to the co-op leaders: don’t expect us to rubber stamp your director candidates, was the message in last week’s results.
It’s clear from the results that Fonterra farmers voted strategically in the board election.
The Fonterra board and shareholders council endorsed three candidates: sitting director Ashley Waugh and two newcomers Peter McBride and Jamie Tuuta.
But shareholders had other ideas: they rejected Tuuta and Waugh but endorsed McBride, the outgoing chairman of Zespri.
They backed South Canterbury farmer Leonie Guiney, a stunning return by the strongest of critics. Another farmer-endorsed candidate, John Nicholls, failed to get elected.
Guiney retired from the board in 2017 after her first three year term but her attempt at re-election ended in controversy.
She was also at the centre of a court action taken by Fonterra over the alleged release of confidential board information.
Guiney campaigned for “a simpler, more disciplined but successful cooperative”. Fonterra needs to cease trying to be what it is not, she said. Farmers liked her message.
Last week’s election results also called the election process into question.
The co-op’s revised election process, implemented last year, requires farmers to vote ‘yes’ or ‘no’ against each candidate. Successful candidates must achieve the 50% ‘yes’ vote threshold.
Online voting requires farmers to cast a vote against each candidate — either ‘yes’ or ‘no’. To win, a candidate must get at least 50% of those voting for him or her, so ‘no’ votes are as essential as ‘yes’ votes.
After farmers failed to elect three directors last week, the Fonterra shareholders council has signalled another election to elect the remaining director.
It seems Fonterra’s board and the council neither expected anyone to stand outside the independent nomination panel process nor thought through the implications. But farmers have already worked it out and voted strategically.
There’s definitely confusion over the Fonterra director election protocol. That’s incredible for an election, throwing up all sorts of interesting combinations and permutations.
Fonterra has had a challenging year, and after recording its first net loss last financial year it is promising major changes. Shareholders are watching.
For the time being they have put their faith in the new chief executive Miles Hurrell. However, the board has been put on notice: if they don’t shape up, they must ship out.
The red meat sector is adopting the New Zealand Government’s ‘wait and see’ approach as it braces for the second Donald Trump presidency in the US.
Fonterra’s board has been reduced to nine - comprising six farmer-elected and three appointed directors.
Five hunting-related shootings this year is prompting a call to review firearm safety training for licencing.
The horticulture sector is a big winner from recent free trade deals sealed with the Gulf states, says Associate Agriculture Minister Nicola Grigg.
Fonterra shareholders are concerned with a further decline in the co-op’s share of milk collected in New Zealand.
A governance group has been formed, following extensive sector consultation, to implement the recommendations from the Industry Working Group's (IWG) final report and is said to be forming a 'road map' for improving New Zealand's animal genetic gain system.
OPINION: Fonterra may have sold its dairy farms in China but the appetite for collaboration with the country remains strong.
OPINION: The Listener's latest piece on winter grazing among Southland dairy farmers leaves much to be desired.