increase font size
Dr Jacqueline Rowarth.
Could soil organic matter be used for carbon credits?
OPINION: Organic matter is the black box of the soil: it determines many factors in biological activities but predicting the outcomes of those biological activities is not easy.
With sand, silt and clay, organic matter affects soil structure, porosity, drainage and nutrient availability. It supports soil organisms by providing energy and nutrients for growth and reproduction.
When these organisms die they contribute to the organic matter. The recycling is not complete because the mineralisation of the organic matter, which is about 58% carbon, releases carbon dioxide and also releases nutrients. The fate of those nutrients depends on rainfall and drainage, activity of plants and other soil organisms and ability of soil and organic matter to ‘hold’ nutrients in the soil profile.
It is one of the conundrums of organic matter that it is both a source and sink of nutrients. Another conundrum is that organic matter holds water, but if it dries out it can be difficult to wet up again.
Overall, it adds considerable value to agriculture because it supports plant growth.
It has also been proposed as adding value through carbon credits.
Like trees growing, when soil organic matter is increasing it sequesters carbon. But unlike tree trunks, the soil organic matter is associated with nutrients which have value in themselves. The cost of building a tonne of carbon into the soil has been estimated at five times that of the carbon credit at present prices of fertiliser.
Of course, money isn’t the only reason to build soil organic matter, but our soils are already rich. A Ministry for the Environment and StatsNZ report, Our Land, indicated that 95% of New Zealand’s soils are in the target range for soil organic matter.
This means that adding more requires a significant change in management – increasing nutrient input (such as fertiliser) or decreasing offtake (by reducing stock numbers, for instance).
This is the basis for regenerative farming, and America has reported an increase to 6% organic matter by using lax rotational grazing. NZ is already, on average, at 8% organic matter under pasture.
America and Australia are discussing bringing soil carbon into a reward system for farmers. This sounds attractive until the details are considered. On a yearly basis, changes in soil organic matter are small and against a large background are difficult to measure. In addition, in NZ variability is very high across the landscape. A further problem is that organic matter is eroded during drought because the soil organisms breaking it down continue their activity, but plants aren’t growing and replenishing it. Farmers could then be faced with a liability.
And who would do the measuring? Another person with a tick-box clipboard?
It is likely that soil organic matter will be included in farm environment plans as an indicator of good management. And farmers already know about good soil management. We know that to increase worms (and other soil organisms), water and nutrients make the difference; the area where the effluent has been sprayed tends to be a hive of activity.
The difference on the Canterbury Plains now in comparison with 20 years ago is considerable. Irrigation and nutrients have built up the organic matter and erosion has been reduced. Dust storms are almost a thing of the past.
The presence of soil organic matter is part of what makes NZ a good country for farming. Most of the time it is maintained in balance, with nutrients in equalling nutrients out. Changes such as additional nutrients and water, as has happened on the Canterbury Plains, can increase the quantity of organic matter. Changes such as removal of water (drought) and nutrients will decrease it.
Research, much of it funded by the NZ Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, is continuing with the aim of understanding more about the ‘black box’, but at the moment adding it to any sort of carbon trading is not advised.
• Dr Jacqueline Rowarth has a PhD in Soil Science (nutrient cycling) and has been analysing agri-environment interaction for several decades.
A new nationwide survey shows New Zealanders expect farmers and food producers to play a leading role in cutting greenhouse gas emissions, but also gave them higher marks than most industries for their current efforts.
OPINION: We are endlessly told that livestock are responsible for half of New Zealand's total emissions.
OPINION: Climate change is shaping up to be one of the major issues at next year's general election.
OPINION: The Financial Times, a major international newspaper, featured New Zealand on its front page at the beginning of June. It wasn't for the right reasons.
OPINION: Across rural conversations, we're heading the same tune: crisis.
NZPork has appointed Auckland-based Paul Bucknell as its new chair.
The Government claims to have delivered on its election promise to protect productive farmland from emissions trading scheme (ETS) but red meat farmers aren’t happy.
Foot and Mouth Disease outbreaks could have a detrimental impact on any country's rural sector, as seen in the United Kingdom's 2000 outbreak that saw the compulsory slaughter of over six million animals.
The Ministry for the Environment is joining as a national award sponsor in the Ballance Farm Environment Awards (BFEA from next year).
Kiwis are wasting less of their food than they were two years ago, and this has been enough to push New Zealand’s total household food waste bill lower, the 2025 Rabobank KiwiHarvest Food Waste survey has found.
OPINION: Sir Lockwood Smith has clearly and succinctly defined what academic freedom is all about, the boundaries around it and the responsibility that goes with this privilege.
OPINION: For years, the ironically named Dr Mike Joy has used his position at Victoria University to wage an activist-style…
OPINION: A mate of yours truly has had an absolute gutsful of the activist group SAFE.
