Tuesday, 19 November 2019 10:55

RMA not good enough

Written by  Peter Burke
Environment Minister David Parker. Environment Minister David Parker.

New Zealand's natural environment is now much more degraded than when the Resource Management Act was developed in 1991.

That’s the view of a Government panel appointed by Environment Minister David Parker to comprehensively review the RMA.

In a new ‘options and issues’ paper, the panel chair, retired Appeal Court judge Tony Randerson, says the aim is to prompt discussion of the issues the panel plans to address in its review. And it will promote options designed to assist people making submissions to the panel in the coming months.

Before going into what possible changes may be considered, the report gives an insight into how it sees the RMA is working. For a start, it notes that NZ’s natural environment is under significant pressures. 

“Climate change is occurring at an unprecedented rate, our native plants and ecosystems are under threat with land changes degrading soil and water.”

It says urban areas are struggling to keep pace with population growth and rapid changes in rural land use have increased pressure on ecosystems. 

In farming areas, water pollution affects almost all rivers and many aquifers, the paper notes. 

And the RMA has not sufficiently protected the natural environment. Decisions made through the RMA system have favoured existing users and, in effect, a bias towards the status quo.

The report sets out 14 areas which the panel believes could be addressed and in a sense there are no surprises. These include how Māori values might be better integrated into a future RMA, how to get consistency and better quality planning processes and plans, and seeing whether some incentive system could be devised to get local authorities to collaborate more effectively. 

It also asks whether the RMA should have a role in climate change and if so what that might that look like.

For the rural community, the contentious issue of the allocation of resources is noted and the report says in the past this has been run on a ‘first come first served’ basis. It asks whether the role of allocating water should remain within the RMA or be put under another Act similar to fisheries and minerals.

Submissions on the issues and options paper close at the beginning of February.

More like this

Editorial: Sense at last

OPINION: For the first time in many years, a commonsense approach is emerging to balance environmental issues with the need for the nation's primary producers to be able to operate effectively.

Editorial: Time for common sense

OPINION: The case of four Canterbury high country stations facing costly and complex consent hearing processes highlights the dilemma facing the farming sector as the country transitions into a replacement for the Resource Management Act (RMA).

Featured

$52,500 fine for effluent mismanagement

A Taupiri farming company has been convicted and fined $52,500 in the Hamilton District Court for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent into the environment.

Ospri brings Bovine TB testing in-house

The move to bring bovine TB testing in-house at Ospri officially started this month, as a team of 37 skilled and experienced technicians begin work with the disease eradication agency.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Arable advocacy?

OPINION: Spare a thought for the arable farmer, squeezed on one side by soft global prices and on the other…

Gaslight much?

OPINION: Labour leader Chris 'Chippy' Hipkins is carrying on the world-class gaslighting of the nation that he and his cohorts…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter