Friday, 21 September 2018 13:17

A water tax isn’t workable

Written by 
The Tax Working Group sees a water tax as a way to increase water use efficiency.  The Tax Working Group sees a water tax as a way to increase water use efficiency. 

IrrigationNZ says that introducing a nationwide water tax is not workable.

Allowing irrigators to continue to invest in more modern irrigation systems rather than taxing them will result in the biggest improvements in water use efficiency, says Irrigation NZ chief executive Andrew Curtis.

“A water tax has been considered in other countries internationally but in every case it has been abandoned. Other countries have found it too complex and expensive to design a fair water tax which can be easily implemented without resulting in adverse outcomes,” says Curtis.   

The Interim Tax Working Group Report touches on some of the complexities around a water tax, like the need to address Māorirights and interests, with many more issues yet to be examined. However, it is good to see the report recognise that many groups use water, and taxation would not just affect irrigators, notes Curtis.

“In Canterbury, for example, 55% of water is consented for hydro-generation, 29% is consented for irrigation and 16% is consented for other uses.”

The Tax Working Group sees a water tax as a way to increase water use efficiency. 

Regulations and limits on water availability are already driving the adoption of more efficient irrigation systems – this is reflected in NZ Agricultural Production Survey statistics which show a big drop in the use of flood irrigation systems which now only account for 5% of irrigated land. 

“Modern irrigation systems have less water and nutrient run-off which is good for the environment. But they are expensive – for example in Canterbury some irrigators will need to spent a total of $80 million replacing their irrigation systems to meet new council rules,” says Curtis.  

“The government and the primary sector agreed this year that audited Farm Environment Plans should be introduced nationwide to improve farm practices including irrigation efficiency. Irrigators have already invested significant time and resources to meet Farm Environment Plan requirements.” 

Curtis says that introducing a blanket national water tax will make it more difficult for farmers and growers to install more efficient irrigation systems and will reduce the amount of money available to change farm practices by adding a new cost for irrigators. 

“Internationally there is also increasing investment occurring in water infrastructure as governments recognise they need to store water in an increasingly volatile climate to provide communities and food producers with a secure water supply. A water tax could make the development of new water infrastructure like the Waimea dam less viable at a time when New Zealand also needs to prioritise developing more rural and urban water storage infrastructure,” Curtis adds.  

More like this

Featured

Nichol is new PGW chair

A day after the ouster of PGG Wrightson’s chair and his deputy, the listed rural trader’s board has appointed John Nichol as the new independent chair.

Fieldays to rebuild Mystery Creek services building

The iconic services building at National Fieldays' Mystery Creek site will be demolished to make way for a "contemporary replacement that better serves the needs of both the community and event organisers," says board chair Jenni Vernon.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Quid prod quo?

OPINION: Ageing lefty Chris Trotter reckons that the decision to delay recognition of Palestinian statehood is more than just a fit…

Deadwood

OPINION: A mate of yours truly recently met someone at a BBQ who works at a big consulting firm who spent…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter