Editorial: Sense at last
OPINION: For the first time in many years, a commonsense approach is emerging to balance environmental issues with the need for the nation's primary producers to be able to operate effectively.
“It looks as though there is nothing we could do today that would even come close to achieving that target. It simply means that if that target is not amended, farming – as we know it today – is not possible. Any form of farming,” Glass says.
But that is no reason to give up on the consultation process, he adds.
“The key thing is that farmers are doing the right thing.
“Everyone is moving in the right direction. Now is not the time for people to lose faith or confidence in the process.
“Potentially this is what these new standards [could cause].”
Glass’ comments follow a Ministry for the Environment (MfE) meeting at Ashburton earlier this month to discuss the Government’s new Essential Freshwater proposals. About 400-500 people attended.
“We’ve got to be very clear about what is achievable, what can be done so that we still have a vibrant community as well as healthy freshwater.”
Glass, who is chief executive of corporate dairy farmer Dairy Holdings and on the board of Dairy NZ, says he is no scientist. But the observation he makes is that in mid Canterbury, for example, the Hines plains have a target under the Environment Canterbury (ECan) plan to get to a level of nitrate in their waterways – including coastal streams and shallow bores – of 6.9 parts per million nitrate
“To achieve that target in the plan ECan has developed [would see] farming intensity dropping by 36% by 2035 along with managed aquafer recharge and stream augmentation. That is to get to 6.9.
“This new NPS (national policy standard) for nitrogen isn’t the same standard which has been there historically. This is a new standard based on dissolved inorganic nitrogen. That includes nitrate, nitrite and ammonia and that needs to be less than 1 part per million.
“At a simple level, the plan already in place with ECan and through public consultation – the one farmers have really stretched and challenged themselves to get to – is now regarded as not being good enough. It has to get to less than one seventh of that number.”
This is not achievable with any kind of farming we know of today, Glass says.
He adds that what came out clearly in the discussion is that even the freshwater panel members themselves could not agree.
“The Government has put this document out for submissions and the panel of experts themselves were unable to agree on what was appropriate for various parts of New Zealand,” Glass says.
“So they have almost gone out inviting feedback from the public to help guide that. That was the piece that was disappointing for me because my expectation is that a panel would have brought in the correct science, weighed up the various issues and concerns and at least formed their own view. But they didn’t do that.”
