Wednesday, 04 December 2019 08:55

NAIT ‘given the finger’ – Minister

Written by  Staff Reporters
Damien O’Connor. Damien O’Connor.

Primary industry “gave the finger” to attempts to overhaul the original NAIT scheme, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says.

It was important that the minister had the ability to direct, O’Connor said in a parliamentary debate on the NAIT Amendment Bill.

The industry body in charge of NAIT, OSPRI, was focussed on getting tags on animals and traceability, not the wider issues of M. bovis management, he said.

“When we asked them for a bit of cooperation to help us [with M. bovis] they were, quite frankly, uncooperative and gave us the finger, quite frankly.”

Under existing law “there was no ability for the minister to step in and ask them to step up their game and focus on not just animal tracing but actually being part of a useful biosecurity system,” he said.

Under the NAIT bill, OSPRI would no longer have a specific biosecurity function, but a clause in new legislation would allow the Government to instruct OSPRI to use NAIT for a biosecurity programme if required.

O’Connor said NAIT needed to be amended because it was missing basic requirements, eg tags linked to a single location.

It appeared a growing number of farmers had been sending stock to processing plants without tags because tags were inconvenient. Farmers would pay a $35 fine for untagged animals but some farmers found the penalty “too easy”.

Now, a tag could only be left off it was genuinely unsafe to tag. Inconvenience would no longer be acceptable, O’Connor said.

The previous biosecurity minister in charge of NAIT, National’s Nathan Guy, said the bill was a good one and his party supported it. One of his concerns, however, was that the ministerial direction clause was snuck in to the NAIT Bill “late in the piece” and that it could give a minister excessive influence over the NAIT scheme.

Guy said he hated to think a minister of the day could direct NAIT officers as to what they should be doing based on a particular government’s priorities or expectations. 

“I would have thought that [the expectation of] any government, whether it’s a blue stripe government or a red stripe government, would be for NAIT to do the right job for farmers, for animals, for biosecurity, for food safety and the like,” he said.

More like this

Animal tracing improves

The latest NAIT data shows farmers are increasing their engagement with the system and becoming more compliant.

Animal tracing improves

The latest NAIT data shows farmers are increasing their engagement with the system and becoming more compliant.

Featured

Parker dropped the EU FTA ball – Nats

Don’t blame the European Union for its “unacceptable” offer to NZ agriculture in current FTA negotiations, blame David Parker, says National's trade spokesman.

 

Grief over grain drain

A whole generation of farmers don’t seem to know about the advantages of feeding NZ-grown grain to livestock, claims Jeremy Talbot.

» The RNG Weather Report

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Fat chance

OPINION: This old mutt has always believed that any hopes of a possible free trade deal – that is any…

Health & safety?

OPINION: WorkSafe and workplace safety legislation dominate the daily operations of the private sector, including farms.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Popular Reads

Honda to quit ATVs in Aus

Honda Australia has signalled it will stop selling quads/ATVs in that country as the discussion about the effectiveness of Crush…