Wednesday, 12 October 2022 15:55

'Highly careless' forestry harvest results in convictions

Written by  Staff Reporters
Typical example of forestry slash waste in stream. Photo Credit: Waikato Regional Council. Typical example of forestry slash waste in stream. Photo Credit: Waikato Regional Council.

Convictions and fines totalling over $100,000 have been imposed for environmental damage caused by a “highly careless” pine woodlot harvest and associated earthworks on a farm in northern Waikato.

Forestry company, Glenn Martin Ltd, and forestry harvest contractor Radiata Harvesting (2017) Ltd and staff were convicted and sentenced in the Auckland District Court last week on a total of 11 charges against the Resource Management Act.

They have been fined a combined total of $104,750.

The prosecution taken by the Waikato Regional Council related to activities from April 2019 through to January 2020 that resulted in over four kilometres of poorly constructed forestry tracking, along with numerous stream crossings.

These actions negatively impacted streams in the area through the discharge of tree waste material and sediment.   

Glenn Martin Ltd was convicted of four charges and sentenced to fines totalling $45,000.

Radiata Harvesting (2017) Ltd was convicted of four charges and sentenced to fines totalling $45,000.

Auckland resident and harvest foreman, Frederick Hunia, was convicted of two charges and sentenced to fines totalling $5000.

Pōkeno earthworks contractor Peter Arnet was also convicted of one charge and fined $9750.

In sentencing in Auckland, District Court Judge Melinda Dickey characterised the forestry harvest as “highly careless, bordering on reckless” in respect to Glenn Martin Ltd and Radiata Harvesting (2017) Ltd.

Waikato Regional Council regional compliance manager Patrick Lynch says the environmental effects of forestry activities are regulated through a national environmental standard.

“This standard has now been in place for some years, and the forestry industry will notice an increased focus by us on compliance with it.

“Where landowners or forestry contractors deviate from these national regulations, resulting in adverse environmental outcomes, they can expect enforcement action to be taken.”

Lynch says in this instance, the forestry harvest management was “very poor”.

“Sediment is one of the main pollutants that adversely affects water quality, in this case the headwaters of the Ohaeroa Stream and ultimately the Waikato River.” 

More like this

Editorial: New Treeland?

OPINION: Forestry is not all bad and planting pine trees on land that is prone to erosion or in soils which cannot support livestock farming makes sense.

$52,500 fine for effluent mismanagement

A Taupiri farming company has been convicted and fined $52,500 in the Hamilton District Court for the unlawful discharge of dairy effluent into the environment.

Featured

Farewell Jim

In a few hundred words it's impossible to adequately describe the outstanding contribution that James Brendan Bolger made to New Zealand since he first entered politics in 1972.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Quid prod quo?

OPINION: Ageing lefty Chris Trotter reckons that the decision to delay recognition of Palestinian statehood is more than just a fit…

Deadwood

OPINION: A mate of yours truly recently met someone at a BBQ who works at a big consulting firm who spent…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter