Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:55

‘Fatal flaws’ sinks Fonterra’s plan

Written by  Sudesh Kissun
Fonterra chair John Wilson says rejection of the proposal means the board and Shareholder’s Council will have to present another option to farmers. Fonterra chair John Wilson says rejection of the proposal means the board and Shareholder’s Council will have to present another option to farmers.

Fonterra's plan to revamp its board failed to attract sufficient support from farmer shareholders because it had "two fatal flaws", say opponents.

Former board member and Northland farmer Greg Gent believes denying farmers the ability to choose between candidates, and delay in reviewing the Shareholders Council, prompted some farmers to vote against the proposal.

Gent says some farmers who voted for the governance and representation proposal were also "not overwhelmingly in favour".

"Shareholders who spoke to us said they voted for it because the board is at least doing something; it's a step in the right direction," Gent told Rural News.

At a special meeting earlier this month, Fonterra's board received 63.7% support for the proposal, short of the 75% required under the co-op's constitution.

The proposal was to reduce the board to 11 – seven farmer-elected and four independent directors -- and to devise a new appointment process for all directors.

The new process would mandate candidate assessment by an independent committee and a recommendation to farmers by the board and Shareholders Council on the most suitable candidate -- meaning farmers wouldn't get to consider candidates who didn't make the grade.

Fonterra chairman John Wilson described it as "significantly different" from the way farmers elect directors now.

"During so much of our farming careers we had a choice from effectively any and all farmers when choosing directors," Wilson said.

"While any and all farmers can enter this new process, the recommendation will be coming from the board and so that change is the piece farmers are giving most consideration to."

However, the rejection of the plan means the Fonterra board and Shareholders Council will relook at the proposal and will present another option to farmers by the end of this year.

Gent says most farmers support the "upfront process" in director election and assessment by an independent committee, but they do not support the board being able to block anyone from standing. "Anyone can stand; that's democracy in my view."

Gent says since the Shareholders Council is also a key part of the director election process its review must be completed earlier. "The Shareholders Council must be up to the job; right now they are not."

Council chairman Duncan Coull says its objective during the review was to ensure that a robust final proposal was presented to shareholders.

"We are confident this was delivered; as the owners of Fonterra the farmers' then had the right to determine the proposal's suitability; the mandate for change must come from them.

Coull says the council's review of its role and functions will begin soon.

Back to the drawing board

Fonterra chairman John Wilson is assuring farmer shareholders that the board and Shareholders Council will have another good look at governance changes.

Wilson says getting just under two thirds of support from shareholders on the first vote was pleasing.

"Of course, we would have loved to get 75%, but two thirds of support on reasonable participation is pleasing."

Wilson says farmers have made it clear the system must change.

"Under the current system, with all the electioneering we not attracting the best people; we have to look into that.

"We will go back and look at how we maintain the same outcome but at the same time consider what we are hearing from farmers."

More like this

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

Editorial: A new era for two co-ops

OPINION: Farmer shareholders of two of New Zealand's largest co-operatives have an important decision to make this month and what they decide could change the landscape of the dairy and meat sectors in New Zealand.

Should co-op sell its consumer brands?

OPINION: As CEO of the Dairy Board in the 1980s I was fortunate to work with a team of experienced and capable executives who made most of the brand investments that created the international consumer business Fonterra inherited. Soprole in Chile was the largest, but there were more than 20 countries where consumer marketing companies were established and Anchor and other brands were successfully launched.

Featured

'One more push' to eliminate FE

Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) is calling on farmers from all regions to take part in the final season of the Sheep Poo Study aiming to build a clearer picture of how facial eczema (FE) affects farms across New Zealand.

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Quid prod quo?

OPINION: Ageing lefty Chris Trotter reckons that the decision to delay recognition of Palestinian statehood is more than just a fit…

Deadwood

OPINION: A mate of yours truly recently met someone at a BBQ who works at a big consulting firm who spent…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter