Greenpeace a charity?
OPINION: Should Greenpeace be stripped of their charitable status? Farmers say yes.
So what went wrong? That's the big question being asked by industry leaders.
"I don't know what happened, but in the end they (the Government) got it so fundamentally wrong," says DairyNZ chair, Jim van der Poel.
He made the comments as DairyNZ lodged its submission to the Government on their proposal to deal with agricultural emissions. As well as making their own submission, DairyNZ is a party to the wider submission being made by the various industry groups which make up the He Waka Eke Noa (HWEN) consortium.
Van der Poel rather kindly suggested that the officials and Ministers who reviewed the HWEN submission and came up with the counter proposal, didn't realise the implications of their changes.
He says when the Government announced their counter proposal, they claimed it was what farmers had wanted, with just a few tweaks. He says, on the face of it, this appeared to be the case, but when his and other groups delved into the detail, it was abundantly clear this was not the case and their response was fundamentally different to the industry proposal and clearly not fit for purpose.
"You never quite know what happens in government. It would seem that a lot of people got involved in the process who were not involved in the initial discussions with us," van der Poel told Dairy News.
"Remember our initial proposal that was put to government was a collaboration of thirteen organisations: ten industry-based, a representative of the Federation of Maori Authorities and two government departments, being Ministry for Priamry Industries (MPI) and the Ministry for Environment (MfE).
"They were active participants in the process when it went forward to government. In our view, the final proposal which everyone signed up to was finely balanced and it was fit for purpose," he says.
But van der Poel says the changes made turned what HWEN had provided into a fundamentally different proposal. He says he's got no idea of how, on what basis and who made the changes. He says, in subsequent discussions when the implications of the changes were relayed back to officials, no one refuted their arguments.
"If you look at some of the potential consequences that come out of their proposal, it has quite an impact on NZ's potential export earnings going forward and also on rural communities - that's pretty random. If they would accept our proposals, there was a really good chance of hitting the right environmental targets but not having the disastrous consequences.
"The government proposal puts the reaching of targets as the number one priority to accept some carnage in the rural community as long as the targets are met. Whereas we have taken a totally different approach, which would incentivise behavioural change with farmers and still hit the targets and not have the impact on rural communities," he says.
Recent rain has offered respite for some from the ongoing drought.
New Zealand's TBfree programme has made great progress in reducing the impact of the disease on livestock herds, but there’s still a long way to go, according to Beef+Lamb NZ.
With much of the North Island experiencing drought this summer and climate change projected to bring drier and hotter conditions, securing New Zealand’s freshwater resilience is vital, according to state-owned GNS Science.
OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.
For Wonky Box co-founder Angus Simms, the decision to open the service to those in rural areas is a personal one.
The golden age of orcharding in West Auckland was recently celebrated at the launch of a book which tells the story of its rise, then retreat in the face of industry change and urban expansion.
OPINION: Should Greenpeace be stripped of their charitable status? Farmers say yes.
OPINION: After years of financial turmoil, Canterbury milk processor Synlait is now back in business.