Wednesday, 25 November 2015 16:11

Time to deliver on governance review

Written by  Sudesh Kissun
Colin Armer (left) and Malcolm Bailey. Colin Armer (left) and Malcolm Bailey.

The proposal to reduce the size of the Fonterra board is one the co-op can no longer ignore say its proponents, Greg Gent and Colin Armer.

The proposal failed to meet the 75% support required to change the constitution but the level of support is a massive message to the board they say. Over 54% of shareholders backed the proposal.

"The Trading Among Farmers proposal got 66% support with millions spent so we are thrilled with the support we have received," says Armer.

"Something has to happen now. The whole thing disappeared three years ago but there is nowhere for the board to hide now."

Gent says the vote was a huge success.

"We had little resources and the company worked hard against us."

Armer said the big loser in this debate was the Shareholders Council.

"The shareholders council has been found wanting and totally misread farmers' views on the subject," he says. "Their criticism of our proposal was absurd.

"The resurrection of the governance review after three years was a last minute jack-up between the Council and the board which had only one purpose – to defeat our proposal," says Armer.

He says that the governance review is still inadequate.

"This upcoming review needs independence, experience, and farmer input into its Terms of Reference," he said. "Right now shareholders don't know the terms of reference and the review is being conducted by a group that lacks the experience or independence needed to make sure we get the right structures into the future."

Gent said that he and Armer had achieved what they wanted to.

"While we'd love to have got our proposal over the 75% line line we always knew that it was a huge mountain to climb," he said. "The company has far better resources than us to communicate with its 10,000 shareholders."

In spite of the result the pair is confident that the governance review will not be shelved for another three years. However they are not so sure that the review will result in a smaller board of directors.

"We will need to wait and see about that," says Armer.

More like this

Fonterra vote

OPINION: Voting is underway for Fonterra’s divestment proposal, with shareholders deciding whether or not sell its consumer brands business.

Winston Peters questions Fonterra divestment plan

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has joined the debate around the proposed sale of Fonterra’s consumer and related businesses, demanding answers from the co-operative around its milk supply deal with the buyer, Lactalis.

Editorial: A new era for two co-ops

OPINION: Farmer shareholders of two of New Zealand's largest co-operatives have an important decision to make this month and what they decide could change the landscape of the dairy and meat sectors in New Zealand.

Featured

Farewell Jim

In a few hundred words it's impossible to adequately describe the outstanding contribution that James Brendan Bolger made to New Zealand since he first entered politics in 1972.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

Milking It

Fonterra vote

OPINION: Voting is underway for Fonterra’s divestment proposal, with shareholders deciding whether or not sell its consumer brands business.

Follow the police beat

OPINION: Politicians and Wellington bureaucrats should take a leaf out of the book of Canterbury District Police Commander Superintendent Tony Hill.

» Connect with Dairy News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter