Dairy power
OPINION: The good times felt across the dairy sector weren't lost at last week's Beef + Lamb NZ annual meeting.
DairyNZ wants the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) to go back to the drawing board on many areas in its proposed Code of Welfare.
It then wants NAWAC to go back out to the industry including farmers for another round of consultation. It supports the code update for clarity, to incorporate recent animal welfare science and lift the bar in areas of the code where common practice surpasses previous standards.
But it does not support changes to the code that increase complexity and inhibit its value as a useful tool, the industry body says in its submission to the code.
DairyNZ wants NAWAC to review all of the proposed changes to minimum standards, example indicators and recommended best practice to align with the criteria in its own guidelines and those of MPI.
It says the volume of change is difficult to review and analyse to provide valuable feedback on, particularly as the discussion document only covers a small proportion of the changes.
"We are concerned that this consultation will not be able to provide for adequate feedback from affected parties (such as farmers) due to the complicated nature of what is being proposed," it submits. "DairyNZ has made considerable effort to collect farmer feedback through multiple methods to support our submission, including a farmer survey, farmer group meetings throughout the country and a simple submission template for farmers.
"However, due the volume of changes, we were only able to focus these efforts on a smaller set of priority issues.
"NAWAC seems to have lost sight of the overall purpose of the code which is to provide detail on the minimum standards that need to be met and to promote recommended best practice. It does not need to be a complete 'how to' manual.
"Industry stakeholders are constantly working on voluntary improvements to animal welfare, for example, the latest intensive winter grazing inspections from previous years. DairyNZ suggest a further round of consultation should be carried out to ensure that all impacted parties have the opportunity to understand the implications of these changes."
DairyNZ says it has concerns regarding cross over and duplication and at times inconsistency of how the code has been written. A few examples where the way the code is drafted does not support farmer understanding are:
Federated Farmers supports a review of the current genetic technology legislation but insists that a farmer’s right to either choose or reject it must be protected.
New Zealand’s top business leaders are urging the US Administration to review “unjustified and discriminatory tariffs” imposed on Kiwi exporters.
New tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump signal an uncertain future, but New Zealand farmers know how to adapt to changing conditions, says Auriga Martin, chief executive of Farm Focus.
A global trade war beckons, which is bad news for a small open economy like New Zealand, warns Mark Smith ASB senior economist.
Carterton's Awakare Farm has long stood as a place where family, tradition and innovation intersect.
Fonterra says the US continues to be an important market for New Zealand dairy and the co-op.
OPINION: Is it the beginning of the end for Greenpeace?
OPINION: The good times felt across the dairy sector weren't lost at last week's Beef + Lamb NZ annual meeting.