Thursday, 11 May 2023 09:55

Farm emissions bottom lines

Written by  Andrew Hoggard
Andrew Hoggard Andrew Hoggard

OPINION: It's the business end of the season when it comes to emissions pricing discussions.

The Government is due to announce a final decision in the next few weeks. This is a big moment for our sector and farmers are understandably wanting to know what Federated Farmers’ position is. New Zealand is already worldleading in greenhouse gas efficiency for meat and milk production. Global warming is worsened if a tax forces a production drop here.

We have been clear and consistent since 2019 about what we stand for and we have three firm bottom lines that we won’t budge on.

Firstly, we won’t support emissions pricing until there has been a review of the current methane reduction targets that takes the different warming impact of methane into account.

Our current methane targets are unrealistic, unscientific and go further than is needed to stop farming’s contribution to warming. We are never going to support a 10% 2030 target that drives a 20% reduction in sheep and beef and a 5% reduction in dairy, while plastering our countryside in pine trees and hollowing out rural communities.

Secondly, we will only support pricing for the purpose of incentivising the uptake of viable mitigation options. Anything else is just a tax on a productive sector, which doesn’t have options.

Because NZ farmers are already the world’s most emissions efficient producers of milk and meat, we are going to need new tools and technology to support further reductions. As it currently stands, we don’t have any tools that can be adopted at scale. Frustratingly, the few options we may have, like feed inhibitors and genetically modified ryegrass, are being held up by a lack of regulatory pathways.

Finally, we won’t support emission pricing if it’s just going to lead to what is called ‘emissions leakage’.

It makes absolutely no sense to reduce our production here, only for the gap in the market to be filled by a less emission efficient producer. That will just ruin our economy while increasing global emissions.

New Zealand should be in the business of exporting food and fibre, not jobs, market share and emissions.

Farmers can have confidence that Fed’s will stick firmly to these bottom lines and won’t accept anything that doesn’t meet them. The Government needs to step back and realise that the world has continued to spin for the last few years, and we are now living in a very different environment.

Now is not the time to pull the handbrake on our productive sector. Individual farmers and companies are innovating at a terrific pace and as consumer preferences and market demands change, so will our farmers.

Andrew Hoggard is national president of Federated Farmers of NZ.

More like this

Sticky situation

OPINION: The Federated Farmers rural advocacy hub at Fieldays has been touted as a great success.

Featured

IFSO urges flood-affected residents to document damage for insurance

Following heavy rain which caused flooding in parts of Nelson-Tasman and sewerage overflows in Marlborough, the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme (IFSO Scheme) is urging homeowners and tenants to be cautious when cleaning up and to take the right steps to support claims.

National

Machinery & Products

Calf feeding boost

Advantage Plastics says it is revolutionising calf meal storage and handling, making farm life easier, safer, and more efficient this…

JD's precision essentials

Farmers across New Zealand are renowned for their productivity and efficiency, always wanting to do more with less, while getting…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Don't hold back!

OPINION: ACT MP Mark Cameron isn’t everyone’s cup of tea, but he certainly calls it how he sees it, holding…

Sorry, not sorry

OPINION: Did former PM Jacinda Ardern get fawning reviews for her book?

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter