increase font size
Canterbury plains.
So much time and energy is spent managing land and water at present, and decisions about rules are only the first step.
What those rules look like and how much they will cost farmers and the community to implement also needs close scrutiny. Take a couple of examples from Canterbury.
Overseer: like it or hate it. Canterbury farmers are required to record an estimate of their nitrogen losses using Overseer. Personally I don’t have an issue with that. But I do have a problem with the rules which require farmers to redo their Overseer assessment every year, whether or not they have made significant changes on the farm.
Then you keep that filed away in case the council ever wants to see it.
Sounds like a dolly, until you start looking at the cost. I’ve been given estimates for annual Overseer assessments (from certified practitioners) ranging from $1000-$1500 for a simple farming operation to $5000-$10,000 for more complex arable and mixed farming systems.
So assuming the 7000-odd farmers in Canterbury were all ‘simple’ Overseer assessments, that rule is costing $7m-$10.5m per annum, but probably a lot more.
Call me a pragmatic greenie, but I would much rather money was spent on doing something constructive on the ground, and keeping the Overseer assessments for when they’re needed.
Some catchment plans require all farms to have a farm environment plan (FEP). Now don’t get me wrong, I happen to think farm plans are a useful tool, and there are some excellent industry programmes.
My beef is that the rules require all farmers to have an audited FEP irrespective of whether there are any potential issues with water quality.
North Canterbury Federated Farmers raised this matter in a recent hearing in Canterbury and the rules in that catchment plan were revised as a result.
My favourite example has to be a water plan in Canterbury which requires all farmers to enter into some sort of binding collective by 2017 or get resource consent to keep farming.
• Lynda Murchison is North Canterbury Federated Farmers provincial president.
Two high producing Canterbury dairy farmers are moving to blended stockfeed supplements fed in-shed for a number of reasons, not the least of which is to boost protein levels, which they can’t achieve through pasture under the region’s nitrogen limit of 190kg/ha.
Rare Canterbury mudfish and tadpole shrimp have been discovered at an environmental restoration site at Bennetts Stream in North Canterbury which is part of a biodiversity initiative being carried out by Waimakariri Irrigation Limited (WIL).
Synlait is hoping that its proposed recapitalisation plan will help retain its spooked farmer supplier base.
The new chair of the Canterbury A&P Association (CAPA) board, Sir David Carter, is pleading for public support for this year's Christchurch Show.
The Lincoln University Demonstration Dairy Farm (LUDF) is crediting a raft of improved management practises in achieving a big turnaround in empty rates.
Recent rain has offered respite for some from the ongoing drought.
New Zealand's TBfree programme has made great progress in reducing the impact of the disease on livestock herds, but there’s still a long way to go, according to Beef+Lamb NZ.
With much of the North Island experiencing drought this summer and climate change projected to bring drier and hotter conditions, securing New Zealand’s freshwater resilience is vital, according to state-owned GNS Science.
OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.
For Wonky Box co-founder Angus Simms, the decision to open the service to those in rural areas is a personal one.
The golden age of orcharding in West Auckland was recently celebrated at the launch of a book which tells the story of its rise, then retreat in the face of industry change and urban expansion.
OPINION: The appendage swinging contest between the US and China continues, with China hitting back with a new rate of…
OPINION: The irony of President Trump’s tariff obsession is that the worst damage may be done to his own people.
