NZ meat industry loses $1.5b annually to non-tariff barriers
Wouldn't it be great if the meat industry could get its hands on the $1.5 billion dollars it's missing out on because of non-tariff trade barriers (NTBs)?
MPI’s Situation Outlook report shows exports growing. Milk prices look solid at about $7/kgMS and the returns for red meat farmers are strong. These prices will be helped by a softening NZ/US exchange rate, though tariff wars may impact farmer returns.
It’s disappointing that Trade Minister David Parker hasn’t visited China yet; we’ve had 10 months of the coalition Government and China is our largest export market worth $12b a year. Political relationships matter, especially in China, and this will have been noted in Beijing.
Also concerning farmers are the coalition Government’s ill-thought-out policies and how they could have a serious impact on the engine-room of the economy.
Most farmers back M.bovis eradication and are awaiting spring milk test results to gauge the spread of the disease. But their nervousness also includes climate change regulations, ETS obligations, petrol taxes, slowing overseas investment, industrial relations reforms and a wide-ranging review of the dairy industry.
National well knows the importance of addressing climate change, but we must do this in a pragmatic, science-based way, not by slapping on yet another tax. It’s vital to address the wider impacts on the economy, jobs and incomes and use technology to help solve our methane emissions.
The ETS shows the Government reaching for the regulation lever rather than researching an enduring solution. The inclusion of animal emissions in the ETS will see farmers annually paying $5000-$10,000 extra in taxes. This won’t have any tangible effect on climate change and no country in the world is doing this. This tax will be felt nationwide all the way to the consumer and will make us globally less competitive -- something this Government doesn’t understand.
A Federated Farmers survey of 1100 members confirmed that farmers are deeply concerned about how the Government’s policies are going to hurt them. It showed a 500% increase in pessimism over just the last 12 months; rural NZ is growing weary of the Government’s intentions.
Business sector surveys show similar pessimism, back ed by an OECD global survey of business confidence that confirms NZ has dropped from second-highest to the bottom. This is a real worry.
Damien O’Connor’s attempts to soften the blows have amounted to little more than lip service. He admitted in parliament recently that we can expect more costs.
His ‘rural proofing’ scheme is a sop: it sounds good but lacks teeth. This so-called ‘guidance tool’ to enable government agencies to get rural communities front-centre when they are designing policy is, in fact, voluntary not mandatory. This means bureaucrats and ministers can easily dismiss and ignore it. Had the scheme been in place earlier this year, would ministers have been advised to ditching financial support for water storage schemes, given that half NZ was in drought last summer?
The recently formed Primary Sector Advisory Council will cost $500,000 a year and no one really knows what its role is apart from designing a strategy for the minister. To achieve anything meaningful it needs freedom to run a cost-of-compliance ruler over all Government policies impacting the primary sector.
While this season’s onfarm returns look positive, dark clouds are massing on the horizon. Decisions coming from the Beehive are not helping business confidence or farmer sentiment.
• Nathan Guy is National’s primary industries spokesman.
