Sunday, 26 April 2015 11:27

SFF quiet on cost critique

Written by 
Professor Keith Woodford. Professor Keith Woodford.

Silver Fern Farms isn’t responding to analysis which suggests its sheepmeat processing costs are the highest by some distance and that it is “one of the laggards” in beef too.

Dissecting the detail in the Meat Industry Excellence-commissioned report, Professor Keith Woodford says figures provided by report authors GHD indicate SFF’s sheep processing costs it $38.26/head – $6.17 more than Alliance and $10.01 over “industry cost leader” Ovation.

“No company can be competitive if it is at a $6 per head disadvantage,” writes Woodford in his blog (http://keithwoodford.wordpress.com).

 While he says it has to be asked whether the costs are accurate, he also reasons that if the figures are not accurate, why would GHD risk its reputation by presenting them?

“Given that Silver Fern Farms processes over five million sheep per annum, it apparently puts them at a disadvantage of more than $30 million on their processing operations. That is a lot to make up through superior marketing,” says Woodford.

Nor does the problem appear to be one of throughput: looking at the three main sheep processors (combined market share 67% in 2013-14), SFF’s capacity utilisation was 49%, Alliance’s 46% and Affco’s 37%.

ANZCO and Ovation, with a combined market share of 17%, are at 51% and 53% utilisation, respectively, while the seven single-chain operators, with a combined market share of 16%, average 63%.

“So in terms of plant utilisation, small is indeed beautiful,” concludes Woodford.

In a follow-up blog on beef, Woodford finds “once again, Silver Fern Farms appears to be one of the laggards, but it is not there by itself....

“Instead, there is evidence that most of the companies have a mix of high cost and lower cost plants, with the best quartile of facilities having labour costs about 25% lower than the rest.”

Despite that and evidence SFF’s beef operating costs are similar to many other companies’, it is inevitable much of the focus will be on SFF, says Woodford. “This is the company that has been struggling the most, in part because of its sheep operations. It is also the company that is currently seeking $100 million new capital.”

SFF told Rural News it would not comment because of that ongoing and confidential capital raising process.

Woodford also recognised the sensitive timing of his commentary.

“If Silver Fern Farms cannot counter with data to show that GHD has got the numbers wrong, or that GHD is not comparing like to like, then the challenge to get investors has just increased.”

More like this

Silver Thin Farms

OPINION: The Hound hears that tension was in the air at the recent Silver Fern Farms AGM, with the board reportedly dazed and confused at why their CEO would continue to hammer farmers to lower their emissions in perpetuity, without being able to state a dollar value for any of the touted premiums.

Featured

Big return on a small investment

Managing director of Woolover Ltd, David Brown, has put a lot of effort into verifying what seems intuitive, that keeping newborn stock's core temperature stable pays dividends by helping them realise their full genetic potential.

Editorial: Sensible move

OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Overbearing?

OPINION: Dust ups between rural media and PR types aren't unheard of but also aren't common, given part of the…

Foot-in-mouth

OPINION: The Hound hears from his canine pals in Southland that an individual's derogatory remarks on social media have left…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter