Wednesday, 16 September 2015 07:00

Red meat levy apathy

Written by 
Beef + Lamb chairman James Parsons says farmers want an organisation to represent their interests and one that provides them with clear demonstrable value. Beef + Lamb chairman James Parsons says farmers want an organisation to represent their interests and one that provides them with clear demonstrable value.

The 2015 sheep and beef levy referendum has ended showing apathetic voter turnout – around the same number as last voted six years ago.

As at 10am last Thursday, 6296 farmers had cast their votes, representing only 37% of the voting papers sent out; the previous referendum in 2006 recorded a 39% turnout.

Voting ended at 5pm on Thursday; a strong ‘yes’ vote was on the cards.

Under the Commodity Levies Act 1990 Beef + Lamb NZ is required to ask sheepmeat and beef producers (including dairy farmers through their cull cows) if they wish to continue funding activities and programmes for six years from 2016-22. 

The current sheep and beef levy orders (the mechanism that allows a levy to be collected) run out in February 2016. 

At least 50% of voting farmers, by both number voting (‘one farmer, one vote’), and their number of stock units (weighted vote), need to support continuing a levy for a new levy order to be approved.

BLNZ held farmer meetings throughout the country to explain what the industry-good organisation is planning 

Chairman James Parsons says while each region has its own issues and climatic challenges, common themes have consistently been raised in discussions.

“Overwhelmingly farmers have said they want an organisation to represent their interests, but importantly one that provides them with clear demonstrable value,” he says.

One area of common interest is the market access work. Farmers seem united in the need for BLNZ to work on their behalf alongside the Government to ensure the best trade arrangements for farmers and ultimately that all tariffs are eliminated. 

Last year this work saved $161 million that would otherwise have gone on tariffs if free trade agreements like those with China and Taiwan had not been in place, Parsons says.

“There is a lot of interest in the potential for our sector through the Trans Pacific Partnership and we fully support the Government’s insistence that we must strike a high quality deal. 

“Some farmers have voiced disquiet at the possibility the deal could weaken New Zealand’s sovereignty, but there was widespread acknowledgment that NZ producers must remain competitive and be a part of the deal if it is to progress."

More like this

Red meat rebound

The red meat sector is poised for a strong rebound this season, with export receipts forecast to top $10 billion and farm profitability to almost double.

The future of beef breeding

Progeny testing at Pāmu’s Kepler farm in Southland as part of Beef + Lamb New Zealand’s Informing New Zealand Beef programme is showing that the benefits of hybrid vigour could have a massive impact on the future of beef breeding.

Methane targets disappoint farmers

Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) has reiterated calls for New Zealand to revise its methane targets after the Government's "disappointing" announcement of its revised Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).

Featured

Editorial: We are Trumped

OPINION: Nothing it seems can be done in the short term to get Donald Trump to change his mind about removing the unfair 15% tariffs that he’s imposed on New Zealand exports to the US.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Wrong focus

OPINION: Your old mate reckons townie Brooke van Velden, the Minister of Workplace (or is it Woke Place) Relations is…

Burn the village

OPINION: There's an infamous term coined by a US general during the Vietnam war, specifically in reference to the battle…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter