Tone deaf?
OPINION: Your old mate can't believe the absolute brass neck of the directors at Beef + Lamb NZ who are asking levypayers for a hefty increase in directors fees at the time of record low red meat prices.
Farmers claim an email, sent last week by DairyNZ chief executive Tim Mackle, makes a mockery of their submissions and the authenticity of the recent consultation.
The charge has been led by lobby group Groundswell and raised criticism of DairyNZ - a key member of the HWEN (He Waka Eke Noa) partnership that ran the farmer consultation process.
Mackle's email says proposals put forward by farmers during the consultation process "miss a lot of detail". He claims there are "strict confines" that need to be worked within and any proposal that is going to get over the line with government "needs to be credible". Mackle states the two options - farm-level and processor-level - put forward by the HWEN partnership have the best chance of success.
But Groundswell claims DairyNZ "has dismissed all alternative emissions proposals the day before the group was due to present its emissions plan to the He Waka Eke Noa secretariat".
"We are deeply disappointed with this pre-emptive action by DairyNZ, which has now cast doubt on the integrity of the entire HWEN consultation process," it says. "This is unacceptable conduct by DairyNZ, farmers deserve much better from our representatives."
ACT rural spokesman Mark Cameron says he shares farmers' disappointment.
"DairyNZ has fallen victim to the Government's fear mongering," he told Rural News. "Arguably it could have said to the Government that both options as they currently sit are non-starters."
Federated Farmers president Andrew Hoggard says Mackle message could have been "better worded".
He says farmers made submissions to the HWEN consultation in good faith and expect changes to the farm-level and processor-level options.
"I think there should be changes if the industry groups want to bring farmers on the journey," Hoggard told Rural News.
He says Mackle's message seems to say that changes unacceptable to the Government won't be included, when in fact DairyNZ should be pushing for changes sought by farmers.
"Consultations have to be genuine. If there are no changes to the proposals then farmers would be disappointed."
Mackle told Rural News that Grounswell's statement is misleading and inaccurate. "We're really disappointed that these claims do not reflect the fair and transparent consultation process that has been undertaken for He Waka Eke Noa," he told Rural News.
"There are certainly no pre-determined outcomes, and no pre-emptive actions have been undertaken by DairyNZ," Mackle says. "We want to reassure all dairy farmers once again that this is an authentic consultation process and we are listening.
"We are reviewing all feedback and proposals for alternative options and will capture the key themes in the existing options, which we believe remain our best chance of success.
"DairyNZ and the partnership (HWEN) want to get farmers the best deal possible, so it's important we get this right. Farmers deserve a better deal than the ETS, so we can maintain profitable businesses while we work to reduce our emissions."
The HWEN's recommendation to government is due on May 31.
Rural News understands Groundswell plans to put a "fourth option" on the table; it will include submissions made by other farmer groups.
