Wednesday, 17 July 2019 10:55

Should NZ embrace gene editing?

Written by  Peter Burke
Lockwood Smith believes NZ is missing out on producing climate change solutions because of our ban on gene editing. Lockwood Smith believes NZ is missing out on producing climate change solutions because of our ban on gene editing.

A plea for New Zealand to embrace gene editing is being sounded by Sir Lockwood Smith.

Smith is a former NZ High Commissioner to London, Speaker of Parliament, trade minister and Massey University scientist.

He told the recent Federated Farmers annual conference that NZ, by holding out on gene editing, is missing an opportunity to deal with climate change and carbon emissions, and to improve pasture species.

Smith says gene editing is a safe process that simply involves slightly altering the best genes in a particular species of animal or plant. 

Embracing gene editing is critically important to enable NZ to progress in key primary sector areas, Smith told the conference. 

Opposition to gene editing “is based on ignorance, and I don’t mean that in an unkind way, I just mean there’s a lack of understanding.

“People are more fearful of wider genetic modification. This involves taking genes from one species and using them in another one… notably the toad/gene thing, which is the other end of gene technology and a track we don’t need to go down right now.” 

Start gene editing now, Smith urged the conference. This is needed now because new pasture species are being researched and gene editing would make them much more efficient.

But it would need doing in the US as it’s banned in NZ. “Our primary industries are suffering financially as a result of this.” 

Scientists in NZ must speak up, says Smith. And news media should not just cover people with colourful, flamboyant views, but also talk to respected scientists.

Asked about Smith’s views on gene editing, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor urged caution. He says big marketers of NZ meat and dairy told him recently in London that they don’t want products in any way genetically modified. 

These companies say NZ has a market advantage in not having GMOs in food. But O’Connor doesn’t rule it out completely for the future, he said.      

“Clearly gene editing is incredibly valuable… but we must ask, who are the consumers of our products and what are they looking for? Being non-GMO gives NZ an advantage now but will it in future and what are the trade offs?” 

O’Connor says he’s not dismissing the technology but it needs a lot more work and discussion for a final decision.

More like this

From Nelson to Dairy Research: Amy Toughey’s Journey

Driven by a lifelong passion for animals, Amy Toughey's journey from juggling three jobs with full-time study to working on cutting-edge dairy research trials shows what happens when hard work meets opportunity - and she's only just getting started.

Featured

Rural contractors call for overhaul of ag vehicle rules

Following a recent overweight incursion that saw a Mid-Canterbury contractor cop a $12,150 fine, the rural contracting industry is calling time on what they consider to be outdated and unworkable regulations regarding weight and dimensions that they say are impeding their businesses.

NZ seeks certainty on US tariff, says McClay

Trade Minister Todd McClay says his officials plan to meet their US counterparts every month from now on to better understand how the 15% tariff issue there will play out, and try and get some certainty there for our exporters about the future.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

A step too far

OPINION: For years, the ironically named Dr Mike Joy has used his position at Victoria University to wage an activist-style…

Save us from SAFE

OPINION: A mate of yours truly has had an absolute gutsful of the activist group SAFE.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter