Monday, 12 May 2025 08:55

Farmers reject ruminant methane strategy

Written by  Staff Reporters
The survey found that 95% of the 1,460 farmers surveyed think that reducing livestock methane won't impact global climate change. The survey found that 95% of the 1,460 farmers surveyed think that reducing livestock methane won't impact global climate change.

According to a new farmer survey, many farmers are rejecting New Zealand’s current ruminant methane strategy.

The survey - prepared by NZ Farming, Groundswell NZ, and the Methane Science Accord – found that 95% of the 1,460 farmers surveyed think that reducing livestock methane won’t impact global climate change.

Additionally, 94% of farmers surveyed say they believe methane cuts should not be a necessary part of market access and 93% refuse to use methane inhibitors on their animals.

Duncan Humm of NZ Farming says there is growing unease in the sector around the ways in which methane inhibitors impact livestock.

“These interventions go against everything our farming systems stand for,” Humm says.

“How did we get this far down the track without consulting the very people expected to deliver these changes?” he adds.

Meanwhile, Helen Mandeno from the Methane Science Accord says that scientific research suggests that ruminants don’t contribute much to the warming of the planet.

“Professor David Frame has shown that New Zealand’s ruminants might, at worst, contribute four millionths of a degree Celsius warming per year,” Mandeno says. “It would take 250,000 years for that to amount to 1 °C.”

The three groups behind the survey say that despite New Zealand’s farmers being leaders in low-emissions food production, they feel ignored as methane reduction policies are pushed forward.

They say farmers want to know why money has been spent on methane tools without farmer consultation, why co-ops joined the AgriZero NZ public-private partnership without asking stakeholders, and who biotechnology tools like methane inhibitors are for if farmers don’t want them.

“Ruminant methane is a natural part of the carbon cycle – don’t punish farmers and their animals for a crime they didn’t commit,” the organisations say.

More like this

Wrong focus?

OPINION: The Hound reckons a big problem with focusing too much on the wrong goal - reducing livestock emissions at the expanse of food production, in this case - is that the Government starts throwing taxpayer coin at increasingly ridiculous ideas.

MSA triumph

OPINION: Methane Science Accord, a farmer-led organisation advocating for zero tax on ruminant methane, will be quietly celebrating its first foray into fertiliser co-operative governance.

'Just answer the damn question!'

OPINION: The first thing one should look for in an article about climate change is what conflicts of interest the author has.

Featured

Waireka Research Station leads biodiversity restoration in New Plymouth

For more than 50 years, Waireka Research Station at New Plymouth has been a hub for globally important trials of fungicides, insecticides and herbicides, carried out on 16ha of orderly flat plots hedged for protection against the strong winds that sweep in from New Zealand’s west coast.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Political colours

OPINION: Your old mate welcomes the proposed changes to local government but notes it drew responses that ranged from the reasonable…

True agenda

OPINION: A press release from the oxygen thieves running the hot air symposium on climate change, known as COP30, grabbed your…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter