Monday, 13 November 2023 13:25

Greenpeace 'anti-farmer and anti-science'

Written by  Staff Reporters
Federated Farmers president Wayne Langford Federated Farmers president Wayne Langford

Federated Farmers president Wayne Langford says Greenpeace has shown itself as an anti-farming lobby by criticising Fonterra’s new on-farm emissions targets.

Fonterra’s targets, released last weeks, would see the co-operative plan to reduce their emissions intensity by 30% by 2030.

“These are ambitious and credible targets that have been designed using the internationally recognized and independent Science Based Target initiative,” says Langford.

The Science Based Target initiative helps companies set clearly defined and scientifically robust plans to reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement goals.

However, Greenpeace last week claimed Fonterra’s targets amounted to little more than “polishing a turd”, saying the co-operative’s proposed climate roadmap contained no real measures to reduce emissions.

“Fonterra is New Zealand’s biggest climate polluter and has the third highest methane emissions of all dairy companies in the world, but it wants us to accept that it can cut emissions through mythical technofixes and offsetting with grass and scattered trees,” says Greenpeace Aotearoa campaigner Christine Rose.

She says the co-operative’s use of a 2018 baseline for its targets is unambitious and inappropriate because this is when the dairy herd was near its peak.

She also claims the plan’s reliance on ‘novel solutions’ is wishful thinking and carbon capture from grass and trees is creative accounting.

“Once again, Fonterra is failing to take meaningful action on its huge contribution to climate change,” she says. “It’s one thing to announce on-farm emissions reduction targets in response to market demands, but without concrete action, targets are meaningless.”

Yet Langford says Kiwi farmers are already the most carbon-friendly in the world, and Fonterra’s targets ask them to go even further.

“True environmentalists should be welcoming such strong leadership from New Zealand farmers who are doing their best, but instead Greenpeace were the first to criticise,” he says.

“Nothing Fonterra could have announced would have been good enough for Greenpeace because they’re anti-farmer and anti-science.

“They’re totally fixated on an impractical plan to half the herd and to ban fertilizer, but that’s completely out of touch with what most Kiwis want,” he explains.

“New Zealanders liked Greenpeace a lot more when they stuck to saving whales. They should get back to that and stop slagging off our world-leading farmers,” he concludes.

More like this

Another win

OPINION: Feds Southland 'pres' Jason Herrick and colleagues who continue the good fight against bureaucratic madness on behalf of farmers, have had another win - for now, at least - getting a court decision granting a 'stay' on rules in the Southland Water and Land Plan until changes can be made to section 70 of the RMA by central goverment, somtheing they clearly signaled after the election.

Featured

Farmers will adapt amid global trade turmoil

New tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump signal an uncertain future, but New Zealand farmers know how to adapt to changing conditions, says Auriga Martin, chief executive of Farm Focus.

National

Machinery & Products

Alpego eyes electric power harrow

Distributed by OriginAg in New Zealand, Italian manufacturer Alpego recently showed its three metre Alysium electric power harrow at the…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Dodgy!

OPINION: If you believe Maori Party president John Tamihere’s claim that “nothing dodgy” occurred at Manurewa Marae during the last…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter