Farmers back ‘gold standard’ regulations for livestock exports
Federated Farmers want to see the return of cattle exports but insists that animal welfare and New Zealand’s international reputation must be protected first.
Government moves to end New Zealand's live export trade will shut down a $500 million-a-year business - as well as diminish farmers' selling options and profitability.
That's the belief of people involved in the country's lucrative livestock live export trade. They also warn of a potential backlash from NZ's most important trading partner, China - where the bulk of our live export trade goes to.
David Hayman, managing director of Waikato-based live export company Genetic Development NZ, describes the Government's decision as one that is aiming for short-term political kudos.
"It is both morally and practically an unjustified decision," he says.
Hayman dismisses the figures used to depict the industry's annual earnings as out-of-date and off a low base. He says the $54 million used was based on the 2018-19 figures, when the live export sector was at a low.
"Around 110,000 cattle were exported last year and the value of that trade was well in excess of $300 million," he adds. "Orders for this year look like 150,000 head at a value nearing $500 million."
Hayman also warns that the move may also have major consequences for NZ's $10 billion annual trade relationship with China.
"We have had a fair indication that there will be a response from China."
South Island-based livestock broker Peter Walsh told Rural News there was very little that could be done about the move as "the Government makes the rules". Walsh's South Canterbury-based company, Peter Walsh and Associates, is the South Island's largest independent, livestock broking company and has seen huge growth in the live export business in the past few years.
He says that ban will have a big impact on NZ's farmers and the country's livestock sector.
"It will be a tremendous blow to farmers in New Zealand as an alternative option for selling livestock," Walsh adds. "Less selling options ultimately means less profit."
Meanwhile, Hayman concedes the industry has suffered from constant misinformation fed to the public by "alarmists" from groups like SAFE and Greenpeace. "As an industry we need to do better job of explaining the way the trade is done and the high standards we adhere to," he adds.
Hayman says claims made by critics of the trade - that animals suffered and there were high death rates - are not supported by the facts. "WE do a world-class job and deliver 99.9% of the animals in good condition, with a loss rate similar to those on NZ farms."
Walsh agrees and sasy the ships animals travel on from NZ are very professional, well manned with high veterinary support.
NZPork has appointed Auckland-based Paul Bucknell as its new chair.
The Government claims to have delivered on its election promise to protect productive farmland from emissions trading scheme (ETS) but red meat farmers aren’t happy.
Foot and Mouth Disease outbreaks could have a detrimental impact on any country's rural sector, as seen in the United Kingdom's 2000 outbreak that saw the compulsory slaughter of over six million animals.
The Ministry for the Environment is joining as a national award sponsor in the Ballance Farm Environment Awards (BFEA from next year).
Kiwis are wasting less of their food than they were two years ago, and this has been enough to push New Zealand’s total household food waste bill lower, the 2025 Rabobank KiwiHarvest Food Waste survey has found.
OPINION: Sir Lockwood Smith has clearly and succinctly defined what academic freedom is all about, the boundaries around it and the responsibility that goes with this privilege.
OPINION: For years, the ironically named Dr Mike Joy has used his position at Victoria University to wage an activist-style…
OPINION: A mate of yours truly has had an absolute gutsful of the activist group SAFE.