Wednesday, 11 January 2012 16:21

Experts to review TAF

Written by 

Fonterra is turning to expert advisors in a bid to make sure its controversial TAF (trading among farmers) proposal ensures 100% farmer control and ownership.

Co-op chairman Henry van der Heyden says the advisors are running the ruler over TAF as part of a comprehensive due diligence process.

Van der Heyden says the Fonterra board's due diligence committee is drawing upon a panel of advisors with deep understanding of the co-operative who will provide technical expertise and critical review.

They include:

• Professor Michael Cook, Missouri University USA, who is an expert on co-operatives;

• Alan Galbraith QC, whose areas of practice include constitutional, commercial and securities law;

• Murray Gough, former chief executive of the New Zealand Dairy Board;

• Paul Oldfield, a director at corporate law firm Harmos Horton Lusk;

• Eric Lucas, a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers;

• Colin Giffney, who is on the board of the Financial Markets Authority and is deputy chair of the Takeovers Panel.

The advisors were picked by Fonterra management and chairman of the board capital structure committee John Wilson. The board's due diligence committee is headed by John Waller and includes Wilson; David Jackson; Jim van der Poel and Nicola Shadbolt.

"The committee will produce a series of reports to the board this year as it reviews progress on TAF, and ensures it stays true to the intent of the co-operative," says van der Heyden.

"A particular focus of the committee will be to ensure that the market is deep, liquid and readily available for farmer shareholders to buy and sell shares when they want.

"Another focus will be changes to DIRA.

"In all their deliberations, front of mind will be the board's commitment to 100 per cent control and ownership."

Fonterra will later this month update shareholders on TAF.

More like this

Smith V Fonterra

OPINION: To a chorus of crying greenies, and not a minute too soon, the Government has moved to put the courts back in their place through proposed amendments to the Climate Change Response Act 2002, intending to limit climate litigation claims such as Smith v Fonterra, in the interests of providing greater certainty for vital industry.

Featured

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Great Idea!

OPINION: Central Hawke's Bay farmer Mark Warren recently told the Hawke's Bay Times it's time for a conversation about allowing…

No Choice

OPINION: A nation that relies as heavily as NZ does on functional global shipping lanes will have to do its…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter