Monday, 30 July 2012 14:10

Deadline for ETS submissions

Written by 

The Government is currently seeking submissions on a raft of proposed changes affecting agriculture in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and the deadline is fast approaching for interested parties to have their say, Anderson Lloyd Lawyers Partner Lesley Brook says.

"The submissions process provides an important opportunity to re-examine how we account for agricultural emissions," Brook says.

"We have to get this right so that when eventual liability to surrender carbon credits for agricultural emissions is introduced, we can be confident that the apportionment of accountability is accurate and fair," she says.

"It is also important to ensure that the Government has accurate data now to influence priorities for investment in research for the reduction of emissions without compromising production."

The consultation document updating the regulations for agriculture in the New Zealand ETS reflects work by the Agriculture ETS Advisory Committee on the practical and technical aspects of bringing agriculture into the scheme.

"The changes that are being proposed now to the regulations will affect not only the accuracy and fairness of reporting as between different agricultural sectors, but also in due course which agricultural sectors will bear what liability to surrender carbon credits," Brook says.

One important principle driving the changes which the Government wants to make is to ensure that different agricultural sectors are not subsidising each other.

"According to the Consultation Document the current approach to the reporting of emissions for the beef meat industry includes about 26% of the emissions from dairy cattle. One proposed change would amend this, so that the dairy industry correctly accounts for all its emissions," Brook says.

"Under the current reporting regulations the sheep meat industry is accounting for emissions from all sheep in New Zealand, even though wool production accounts for about 30% of total sheep emissions. That is also to be corrected under one of the changes in the Consultation Document.

Another crucial issue the consultation document considers is which agricultural sectors should be included in the Scheme and which should not. Where should that line be drawn?

"The wool industry is not currently included in the Emissions Trading Scheme 'for administrative and practical reasons'. Should it be included? If so, where would the point of accountability for emissions lie? If it is not included then New Zealand's international liability in respect of emissions from these sheep will be borne by taxpayers generally rather than by the wool industry," Brook says.

The regulations require agricultural emissions to be reported by the meat and dairy processors, not by farms, at least for now. While this is administratively simpler, it also means emissions calculations are currently based solely on production levels, Brook says.

More like this

Getting sheep shape at Pyramid Farm

The vineyards at Pyramid Farm in Marlborough’s Avon Valley have never been run of the mill, with plantings that follow the natural contours of the land, 250 metres above sea level.

Featured

Farmers urged not to be complacent about TB

New Zealand's TBfree programme has made great progress in reducing the impact of the disease on livestock herds, but there’s still a long way to go, according to Beef+Lamb NZ.

Editorial: Making wool great again

OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.

National

Machinery & Products

Farmer-led group buys Novag

While the name and technology remain unchanged and new machines will continue to carry the Novag name, all the assets,…

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Make it 1000%!

OPINION: The appendage swinging contest between the US and China continues, with China hitting back with a new rate of…

Own goal

OPINION: The irony of President Trump’s tariff obsession is that the worst damage may be done to his own people.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter