Thursday, 27 February 2020 11:01

$954 bill and three-year bovine ban for tail-breaker

Written by  Staff Reporters
Steiner’s actions caused “unreasonable and unnecessary” pain and distress to the cows in his care. Steiner’s actions caused “unreasonable and unnecessary” pain and distress to the cows in his care.

A Waikato farmer who admitted to breaking the tails of more than 300 cows has been sentenced to community work and banned from owning cows.

Glen Raymond Steiner appeared in the Tokoroa District Court on Wednesday for sentencing after the case was brought to court by the Ministry for Primary Industries.

Steiner has been disqualified from owning or being in charge of all bovine animals. He earlier pleaded guilty to one representative charge of ill treatment of animals.

Judge Tony Snell took a starting point of six months' imprisonment and gave discounts for it being Steiner's first conviction, as well as his personal circumstances and early guilty plea.

The 43-year-old contract milker was sentenced to four months' community detention and 120 hours' community work in addition to being disqualified from owning or being in charge of any bovine animal for three years. 

He was ordered to pay vet bills of $954.

Judge Snell commented that Steiner's actions were in the upper limit of this type of offence and that the type of offending and its effect on the industry was significant. 

It could easily cause reputation harm to the dairy industry and the individual farming operation involved, he said.

MPI animal welfare and NAIT compliance manager Gray Harrison said the offending first came to light after a mob of dairy cull cows he sent to the meat works were found to have tail breaks.

“A MPI veterinarian reported the tail breaks, which led us to inspect the remainder of the herd at the dairy farm where Steiner worked.”

Of the 313 cows that Steiner physically handled, the majority were found to have been handled in a way that caused tail breaks.

More than 150 cows were found to have multiple breakages in their tails and 133 were determined to be recent breakages. 

In the agreed Summary of Facts, Steiner’s actions were deemed to have caused “unreasonable and unnecessary” pain and distress to the cows in his care.

As a contract milker, it was his responsibility to ensure all animals on the property were handled in a way that minimised pain, distress and injury; including tail breakages.

Scientific research indicates it would require significantly more force to break a tail than dislocate a finger and the breaking of a tail or twisting would cause immediate, severe pain and distress.

More like this

New law to give bite to organics

Legislation aimed at tightening up the rules and laws on organic products has drawn widespread support from the organic sector.

Featured

 

COVID-19: Tax relief for M. bovis farmers

Farmers whose herds were culled in response to the outbreak of Mycoplasma bovis will be able to minimise the tax treatment of their income in some circumstances.

» The RNG Weather Report

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Flying high

This old mutt would like to know how the sanctimonious Green Party and its MPs can continue to lecture everyone…

Put it down

Your canine crusader notes that the woke folk at Landcorp – sorry Pāmu – were recently crowing about recording a…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Popular Reads

Rules driving farmers out

New farming rules around sustainability are driving elderly farmers out of the dairy industry, says agri-economist Phil Journeaux.