Wednesday, 10 March 2021 17:55

Dubious politics at play

Written by  Owen Jennings
Farmers are already offsetting methane emissions. Farmers are already offsetting methane emissions.

OPINION: FARM (Facts About Ruminant Methane) is a group of farmers and scientists who question the need for drastic cuts in ruminant methane. Owen Jennings prosecutes FARM’s argument in the second of a two part opinion piece…

 

The other reason proponents, such as the Climate Change Commission, argue that we have to take actions is that methane is NZ’s big problem – because our livestock numbers are high relative to other GHG-producing activities – so we need to pull our weight and “do something”.

Answer:  We are already doing something. 

Our farmers are way ahead of the play.  They are already offsetting all the methane they produce by sequestering huge amounts of CO₂. Their grass, soil and other farm vegetation absorbs as much GHG as their cows and sheep produce.  All vegetation takes in CO₂ for photosynthesis. 

This balanced situation using the age-old natural carbon cycle separates farming from other GHG emitters who have no natural offset.  That is why farming should never be in the ETS or face any restrictions.

But wait there is more.

Of the one degree Celsius of warming we have recorded over the last 150 years, methane is allegedly responsible for a mere 10% -20% of this increase.  Some 40%, at least, of methane emissions are natural.  So, the effect of 10% reduction proposed by the Climate Change Commission makes no sense at all.  It is pitiful.

Hang about – it gets even worse still.  And it is going to get all complicated and ‘sciencey’.

GHGs operate in the electromagnetic spectrum.  Figure 1 (shows the radiation transmitted by the atmosphere as UV, visible light and Infrared radiation (see the yellow band in the figure). The left-hand side of the figure (left of the red dotted line) shows the region of incoming solar radiation (0.2 to 3 micrometres wavelength span). The right-hand side denotes the re-radiation from earth as long-wavelength infrared energy covering the 3 to 70 micrometre span. 

Each greenhouse gas is analysed separately in the lower part of the graph.  The width and height of each absorption peak for each gas is clearly shown. The height of the peak denotes the maximum amount of radiant energy that each gas can possibly absorb over that range of wavelengths. The width of each absorption band shows the precise wavelengths to which that the particular greenhouse gas responds.

It you examine each gas, you will see that methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone, only have a few narrow absorption bands with none absorbing 100% of any wavelength.  Even CO₂ has only four peaks where absorption is over 50% and these occur in narrow bands, meaning CO₂ absorbs little energy. 

Water vapour, in stark contrast, absorbs over a far wider range of wavelengths with three broad peaks of maximum 100% absorption and multiple small peaks.  Above about 18 micrometres water vapour absorbs 100% of outgoing infrared energy.

The published evidence shows that by far the dominant GHG absorbing solar radiation is water vapour.  The absorption potential of solar radiation by the other GHGs is minuscule or absent. 

From a farmer’s point of view, methane and nitrous oxide can clearly be ignored as having no appreciable effect on warming.

At a total only 0.012% of all the GHGs, or 0.00018% of the total atmosphere methane (and nitrous oxide) is physically incapable of impacting temperature. 

And we are going to beat our chests over a 0.13% reduction per year of something already unbelievably trivial and inconsequential. 

Time for a brain check, surely!

Even decimating our entire cow herd and all our sheep will not make any impact on temperature at all – so infinitesimal it could never be measured by the most effective measuring tool. 

Meanwhile, the Climate Change Commission and the Government put their collective heads in the sand over Article 2 of the Paris Accord.  Pretending we can cut the national herd by 15% plus other constraints, and not have a disastrous reduction in production and exports simply shows alarming ignorance.

One can only further conclude that something else is going on that isn’t science – virtue signalling by NZ leaders and dubious politics at international level.

More like this

Ringing the alarm bells loudly

OPINION: Ruminant methane mitigation tools were a bit of a joke when first proposed; surely no one would be foolish enough to interfere with nature at its best. Any such propaganda from our sector on mitigation went straight into file 13.

Tackling technocrats

OPINION: Not long after I started farming, I needed some bridge stringers to cross a small, on-farm stream.

A significant fertiliser breakthrough?

Former ACT MP and Federated Farmers president Owen Jennings believes he's come across a new fertilising method in Australia that yields "outstanding results".

Strong leadership needed!

OPINION: Right now, rural New Zealand needs strong, decisive leadership on climate change matters.

Featured

Rural contractors call for overhaul of ag vehicle rules

Following a recent overweight incursion that saw a Mid-Canterbury contractor cop a $12,150 fine, the rural contracting industry is calling time on what they consider to be outdated and unworkable regulations regarding weight and dimensions that they say are impeding their businesses.

NZ seeks certainty on US tariff, says McClay

Trade Minister Todd McClay says his officials plan to meet their US counterparts every month from now on to better understand how the 15% tariff issue there will play out, and try and get some certainty there for our exporters about the future.

Trial shows benefits of spring nitrogen use

A landmark New Zealand trial has confirmed what many farmers have long suspected - that strategic spring nitrogen use not only boosts pasture growth but delivers measurable gains in lamb growth and ewe condition.

Eric Roy: Championing the pork industry

It was recently announced that former MP and Southland farmer Eric Roy has stepped down of New Zealand Pork after seven years. Leo Argent talks with Eric about his time at the organisation and what the future may hold.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Save us from SAFE

OPINION: A mate of yours truly has had an absolute gutsful of the activist group SAFE.

"Our" business?

OPINION: One particular bone the Hound has been gnawing on for years now is how the chattering classes want it…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter