Science 'deserves more funding'
A committee which carried out the review into New Zealand's science system says the underinvestment will continue to compromise the country's future.
A leading soil scientist says the exact science to meet the demand by the public and government to improve water quality hasn't been in place.
Massey University's professor Mike Hedley says consequently the policymakers have made decisions without really knowing what the exact changes to farm management need to be to achieve this outcome.
He says much of the science used has been in nutrient budgeting, which works well at paddock and farm scale but is poorly connected to water quality.
Hedley is director of the Fertiliser and Lime Research Centre, Massey University, which last week held its annual workshop at the Manawatu campus. At least 250 scientists, farmers and rural professionals attended the three-day event.
This year's theme was nutrient and water management for sustainable farming. Hedley says it was designed to link with the Government's latest science challenge 'Our Land and Water', which will see $230 million spent by CRIs and universities over the next ten years to produce definitive science on how to best manage land and water in New Zealand.
He hopes the collective science expertise will yield real answers for farmers struggling to try to change their farming systems and reduce the impact of diffuse discharge into water.
Hedley says a suggestion that land should be viewed in terms of its suitability rather than its capability will signal a change in land use. In the past, science has mostly driven productivity, irrespective of the potential adverse effects that could have on the environment.
"We need a bit of rethinking of the mitigation strategies of different land units and soil types," he explains. "Some, but not all of it, can be done on individual properties, but it is going to be a tough one to crack and we have to discuss that with farming communities.
"A scenario could involve neighbouring farmers collaborating and developing a share farming agreement; for example, where at a certain time of year they don't have intensive stock on certain soils on one of the farms when there is a high risk of leaching nitrogen or phosphorous into the water."
Hedley believes hard questions will have to be asked about the way we farm in NZ. He says in the present environment of low returns for some agricultural products, farmers are looking more closely at their operations. He suggests this may be a good time for them to look long-term and identify sustainable options for their farms.
Farmlands says that improved half-year results show that the co-op’s tight focus on supporting New Zealand’s farmers and growers is working.
Horticulture New Zealand (HortNZ) says that discovery of a male Oriental fruit fly on Auckland’s North Shore is a cause for concern for growers.
Fonterra says its earnings for the 2025 financial year are anticipated to be in the upper half of its previously forecast earnings range of 40-60 cents per share.
Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) is having another crack at increasing the fees of its chair and board members.
Livestock management tech company Nedap has launched Nedap New Zealand.
An innovative dairy effluent management system is being designed to help farmers improve on-farm effluent practices and reduce environmental impact.
OPINION: Ruth Richardson, architect of the 1991 ‘Mother of all Budgets’ and the economic reforms dubbed ‘Ruthanasia’, added her two…
OPINION: Why do vegans and others opposed to eating meat try to convince others that a plant based diet is…