DairyNZ chair wants cross-party deal
New DairyNZ chair Tracy Brown says bipartisan agreement among political parties on emissions pricing and freshwater regulations would greatly help farmers.
Especially from the beef and sheep sector - including many iwi with substantial beef and sheep interests - and the architects of their misery, He Waka Eke Noa, find themselves backed into a corner of their own making.
As Climate Change Minister James Shaw says, somewhat disingenuously, this is what the industry proposed. To be fair, the Government's version of the proposal differs on some key aspects, but in the main is what levy-funded industry leaders proposed on behalf of farmers, and is what those same farmers are now faced with.
As farmer ginger group, loosely named ‘Waka Adrift’, notes, when the PM made the announcement that the proposal put forward by industry was, by and large, being accepted: “In a refreshingly transparent way, the PM also highlighted the financial and social impacts on sheep, beef and deer farmers – their own modelling revealing a likely 20% plus exodus forced from the sector. Given that the modelling released by B+LNZ after consultation showed a similar level of potential impact, we are now finding it hard to understand why the levy bodies are responding so negatively to the government proposal.”
Some will baulk at the accusation that HWEN partners made a “conscious decision to sacrifice sheep and beef farmers and their communities to create the offset for more intensive farming to continue and this has now been exposed”. And some will not: After a fiery meeting in Gore on Oct 28, Southland farmer Hugh Gardyne has written to B+LNZ chief executive Sam McIvor, on behalf of farmers at the meeting, to express their anger and frustration about how it has represented the sheep and beef sector via the HWEN process.
‘Waka Adrift’ started ringing alarm bells weeks ago, to draw attention to the serious risks that the HWEN proposal posed to the future of the extensive sheep, beef, deer and regenerative farms and rural communities. They warned that the ‘consultation’ with farmers was too rigid and narrow, and that farmers did not know exactly what they were being signed up for.
Now they know, and they’re not happy. The question is, is it too late for industry leaders to harness their “disappointment” with the outcome to force some major changes to the Government’s proposal?
