Tuesday, 04 September 2012 16:38

Case made for company vs trust

Written by 

THOUGH MANY farms are in trusts, Palmerston North Crown prosecutor Ben Vanderkolk believes this creates problems in succession planning. 

He says essentially a trust is ‘just a bundle of rights and obligations’ which doesn’t ‘own anything’.  The obligation of the trustees is to look after the interests of the ‘beneficiaries’, in most cases siblings.

“A trust has no corporate structure so it doesn’t grow or prosper or manage anything. Trusts are very difficult to unscramble. The key problem is that the trustees are the owner of the whole asset – it is difficult to administer in a way that children can get funds out or have their entitlement distributed to them.  And it’s rare that children will challenge the trustees, who are usually the parents alongside the family solicitor and accountant.”

Vanderkolk says from what he’s seen, trusts have a place in protecting assets but are poor vehicles for farming operations and capital holding. And structurally they are difficult to operate.  A question worth asking, when considering setting up a trust, is, can you guarantee that you can control it after your death? 

“With a company you can have just enough capital needed to run the business, and the rest of the capital generated as dividends, profits and retained earnings is available for investment off the farm or to buy shareholders out. There are advantages in a company structure because equity is reflected by the value of the shares, directors are charged with increasing shareholder value and capital can be managed to successfully fund the operation.”

With a company structure, the children could be encouraged to participate in its governance as opposed to merely being employees on farm.  Parents or owners should find out what their children want to do and make sure the entity has sufficient capital for them to pursue off-farm careers if that’s what they want.

“Fundamentally a company director has to protect the value of the company shareholding whereas a trustee has a duty to protect and promote the benefit and maintenance of the beneficiaries, not necessarily grow the wealth of the business. Farmers should be able to concentrate on farming and governance of the farming enterprise rather than worry about the discharge of their fiduciary duty as trustees.”

• For a profile of Ben Vanderkolk turn to pages 10-11

More like this

Be aware of potential liabilities

It is important for potential trustees to weigh up the risks compared to the rewards when considering whether or not to accept a role on a trust, says Tony Marshall, tax advisory principal, Crowe Horwarth's Dunedin office.

Featured

Case IH partners with Meet the Need

Tractor manufacturer and distributor Case IH has announced a new partnership with Meet the Need, the grassroots, farmer-led charity working to tackle food insecurity across New Zealand one meal at a time.

25 years on - where are they now?

To celebrate 25 years of the Hugh Williams Memorial Scholarship, Ravensdown caught up with past recipients to see where their careers have taken them, and what the future holds for the industry.

Rockit Global appoints COO

Rockit Global has appointed Ivan Angland as its new chief operating officer as it continues its growth strategy into 2025.

National

Machinery & Products

Iconic TPW Woolpress turns 50!

The company behind the iconic TPW Woolpress, which fundamentally changed the way wool is baled in Australia and New Zealand,…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Keep it up

OPINION: The good fight against "banking wokery" continues with a draft bill to scrap the red tape forcing banks and…

We're OK!

OPINION: Despite the volatility created by the shoot-from-the-hip trade tariff 'stratefy' being deployed by the new state tenants in the…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter