Tuesday, 04 September 2012 16:38

Case made for company vs trust

Written by 

THOUGH MANY farms are in trusts, Palmerston North Crown prosecutor Ben Vanderkolk believes this creates problems in succession planning. 

He says essentially a trust is ‘just a bundle of rights and obligations’ which doesn’t ‘own anything’.  The obligation of the trustees is to look after the interests of the ‘beneficiaries’, in most cases siblings.

“A trust has no corporate structure so it doesn’t grow or prosper or manage anything. Trusts are very difficult to unscramble. The key problem is that the trustees are the owner of the whole asset – it is difficult to administer in a way that children can get funds out or have their entitlement distributed to them.  And it’s rare that children will challenge the trustees, who are usually the parents alongside the family solicitor and accountant.”

Vanderkolk says from what he’s seen, trusts have a place in protecting assets but are poor vehicles for farming operations and capital holding. And structurally they are difficult to operate.  A question worth asking, when considering setting up a trust, is, can you guarantee that you can control it after your death? 

“With a company you can have just enough capital needed to run the business, and the rest of the capital generated as dividends, profits and retained earnings is available for investment off the farm or to buy shareholders out. There are advantages in a company structure because equity is reflected by the value of the shares, directors are charged with increasing shareholder value and capital can be managed to successfully fund the operation.”

With a company structure, the children could be encouraged to participate in its governance as opposed to merely being employees on farm.  Parents or owners should find out what their children want to do and make sure the entity has sufficient capital for them to pursue off-farm careers if that’s what they want.

“Fundamentally a company director has to protect the value of the company shareholding whereas a trustee has a duty to protect and promote the benefit and maintenance of the beneficiaries, not necessarily grow the wealth of the business. Farmers should be able to concentrate on farming and governance of the farming enterprise rather than worry about the discharge of their fiduciary duty as trustees.”

• For a profile of Ben Vanderkolk turn to pages 10-11

More like this

Be aware of potential liabilities

It is important for potential trustees to weigh up the risks compared to the rewards when considering whether or not to accept a role on a trust, says Tony Marshall, tax advisory principal, Crowe Horwarth's Dunedin office.

Featured

Editorial: The Value of Credibility

OPINION: In politics, credibility is and should be big. It must surely rank higher than charisma, which is quite trite and superficial. Yet, voters nowadays are often wooed and influenced by how someone looks or talks at a superficial level. TV plays a huge role in this.

Kaikōura Families Get School Run Lifeline After Storm

Kaikōura families affected by July's severe storm have found a practical solution to a problem that's kept some children away from regular schooling for weeks: a washed-out section of Inland Kaikōura Road, which has stopped the local school bus from running its usual route.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

'LinkedIn Greens'

OPINION: The same mainstream media muppets that brought you Jacindamania in 2017 have been flat out pimping for the Opportunities…

UK Warning

OPINION: Your old mate reckons the atrocious way farmers in the UK are treated by their lords and masters in…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter