Thursday, 01 May 2014 15:15

Brand New Zealand development crucial

Written by 

DEVELOPING BRANDS is not in New Zealanders’ DNA, but we must develop it if we want to retain market share in world markets, says a visiting UK food marketing expert, Dr David Hughes.

 

“Fonterra talks about turning to higher value products, but they need to get on with it,” says Hughes, who is a UK professor of food marketing and an international speaker on food trends.

As the international dairy market grows, New Zealand domestic production will not keep pace so market share will decline. “You must go outside New Zealand to produce dairy which to a degree you are in China but you would expect more. But if you can’t keep up with sheer volume production at home you should produce higher value products, so your value share doesn’t decline.”

Sixty per cent of global growth in infant formula in the last five years has come from China and Hong Kong. New Zealand has provided the raw material, but infant formula is highly branded with the biggest global food companies, Nestle, Danone, Mead Johnson and Abbott Laboratories,  having their own brands and 50% of global market share.

“Infant formula is largely milk powder with pixie dust and a strong brand. But the margins are made by the brand owners so you guys are commodity orientated and providing the raw materials. 

“Fonterra does have an infant formula brand but it’s a very new one and still at the pilot stage, so it prompts the question, why weren’t you into that earlier?”

Brands are not in the New Zealand DNA, he says. “There are examples of good regional brands if you look in Asia: Anlene is an example, but there are too few of them. In history you see yourselves more as commodity producers and very, very good ones.

“As the cost of production in New Zealand increases because of higher land prices, more difficulties with planning regulations and environmental requirements, it would be helpful if you were into higher value products.

“This means intellectual property, patented special ingredients or more branded products. That’s a journey you are on at the moment but you still have a very long way to go.”

Hughes says Fonterra’s need to speed up its move to higher value products is a farmer problem. “Farmers own Fonterra. Farmers tell Fonterra ‘don’t do anything clever, just sell the milk powder for as much as you can and send as much of that money back to the farm’.

“That disallows Fonterra to invest in more R&D so they can develop specialty high value food ingredients, and it gives them insufficient budgets to invest at the level they need to in brands.”

The shift requires farmer leadership, he says. “They have to at some stage say ‘send less back, invest more in brands and R&D and in the longer term that will benefit us disproportionately’. 

“But if you don’t allow that to happen, you will continue on the commodity path.”

Featured

A big win for wool!

State-owned social housing provider Kainga Ora is switching to wool carpet for its new homes.

Editorial: Sense at last

OPINION: For the first time in many years, a commonsense approach is emerging to balance environmental issues with the need for the nation's primary producers to be able to operate effectively.

National

Machinery & Products

Calf feeding boost

Advantage Plastics says it is revolutionising calf meal storage and handling, making farm life easier, safer, and more efficient this…

JD's precision essentials

Farmers across New Zealand are renowned for their productivity and efficiency, always wanting to do more with less, while getting…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Are they serious?

OPINION: The Greens aren’t serious people when it comes to the economy, so let’s not spend too much on their…

A hurry up!

OPINION: PM Chris Luxon is getting pinged lately for rolling out the old 'we're still a new government' line when…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter