Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:28

Jury still out on TAF

Written by 

AS FONTERRA last month announced a 33% surge in half-year net profit, its share price had another story to tell.

 

The co-op’s share soared to $7.50, a jump of 50c on the back of the financial results. It was launched in November last year at $5.50/share. For Fonterra’s farmer shareholders, the financial results are bittersweet.

A 30c/kgMS lift in milk payout will go some way to ease the pain of drought. However, for South Island farmers, shielded from the drought, buying more Fonterra shares to match increased production has just become harder.

TAF (trading among farmers) may have fixed the redemption risk to Fonterra’s balance sheet. But it has exposed the co-op’s lifeblood – milk supply – to a new threat.  Fonterra could lose milk supply because its share price is now too high for farmers to buy in. 

Delegates to a recent Federated Farmers dairy council meeting said they were aware of suppliers who had already switched to other processors. A declining milk supply would be against the co-op’s strategy to lift volume and value.

This brings us to the question, is TAF working? Fonterra’s board and management, the architects of TAF, will say yes. For shareholders, the jury is still out.

TAF introduced a trading market for farmers to trade milk supply-linked shares among themselves, relieving Fonterra of the obligation to trade its shares, which directors argued exposed its balance sheet to a run on capital.

Many farmers opposed TAF, fearing the offer of units to sharemarket investors was the first step in loss of farmer control and ownership of New Zealand’s biggest company. 

TAF may have enough measures in place to ensure 100% shareholder control. But the out-of-control share price, set by the share market, is ironically driving shareholders away from the co-op.

Five years ago, all farmers in Fonterra had common interests. What was good for one farmer was good for all farmers. Now, some farmers have interest in Fonterra units, as do investors around the world. Fonterra also has to ensure a fair dividend to investors, balancing it with a decent payout to its shareholders. There are factions within the co-op governance structure. 

No one said TAF was going to be simple. But some shareholders did warn it would open a can of worms. They appear correct.

More like this

Editorial: Marlborough's viticulture evolution

OPINION: When I moved to Marlborough two decades ago, I found countless lines of tidy vines, neatly mowed and carefully sprayed, with diligent conventional practices interspersed with the odd organic or cover-cropping outlier, like Te Whare Ra.

Editorial: Getting RMA settings right

OPINION: The Government has been seeking industry feedback on its proposed amendments to a range of Resource Management Act (RMA) national direction instruments.

Editorial: Agri's mojo is back

OPINION: Good times are coming back for the primary industries. From sentiment expressed at Fieldays to the latest rural confidence survey results, all indicate farmer confidence at a near-record high.

Featured

Te Radar celebrates kiwi farming heritage in latest release

Undoubtedly the doyen of rural culture, always with a wry smile, our favourite ginger ninja, Te Radar, in conjunction with his wife Ruth Spencer, has recently released an enchanting, yet educational read centred around rural New Zealand in one hundred objects.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Political colours

OPINION: Your old mate welcomes the proposed changes to local government but notes it drew responses that ranged from the reasonable…

True agenda

OPINION: A press release from the oxygen thieves running the hot air symposium on climate change, known as COP30, grabbed your…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter