Thursday, 10 April 2025 09:55

Editorial: Getting the RMA overhaul right

Written by  Staff Reporters

OPINION: Making it easier to get things done while protecting the environment - that's the Government's promise when it comes to the overhaul of the problematic Resource Management Act (RMA).

New planning and environment laws that protect property rights and improve productivity, while reducing red tape and compliance costs for farmers, are coming.

However, at this stage, the farming sector is giving only qualified support to the reforms. For many farmers the devil could be in the detail.

The RMA has become a political football. The last Labour Government passed its own replacement legislation, only for the National-led coalition Government to repeal it shortly after. The country has now reverted to the original 1991 law with National proposing to replace the RMA with two new pieces of legislation: a Natural Environment Act - focused on managing the natural environment, and a Planning Act - focused on planning to enable development and infrastructure.

The Government is signalling a radical transition to a far more liberal planning system with less red tape, premised on the enjoyment of property rights.

But for red meat farmers, the idea of mechanisms such as allocation of tradeable rights to individual farms, or cap and trade systems, as a way of addressing water quality issues isn't a good one. They claim these mechanisms will be expensive, complex and unworkable.

B+LNZ points out that overseas examples have shown market-based models can lead to unintended consequences, driving further intensification of already intensive systems at the expense of extensive farming systems. This may leave stranded land assets or further afforestation in our hill country.

Then there are concerns around proposed changes to fines which could see a significant increase in what farmers could be fined for, regardless of whether any failings were intentional or not.

Concerns around water quality regulations are being raised by dairy farmers. DairyNZ opposes putting a 'number' on freshwater contaminants because of the complexity of the contaminants and the freshwater systems in each catchment.

Federated Farmers thinks the Government has delivered a pragmatic and common-sense plan that will put respect for property rights front and centre. 

Farmers want clarity and are telling the Government that they want enduring policies that provide long-term certainty for farmers.

More like this

RSE Scheme Changes Coming - McClay

Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has admitted that a scheme bringing workers from Pacific nations to work on orchards has become too hard to navigate but says changes are coming.

DairyNZ: Waikato Farmers Need Certainty on PC1 Rules

DairyNZ says Waikato farmers need certainty on Plan Change 1, but they say that certainty must be matched with practical, workable rules and a clear transition that doesn't get ahead of the new resource management system currently under review.

Featured

Sharemilkers Credit DairyBase Tool for Staffing Decisions

Signing up to a benchmarking tool is not about competition, but about improving collectively, says Ximena Puig and Alvaro Luzardo who are 50-50 sharemilkers at a 164-hectare (effective) dairy farm in Eketāhuna in the Lower North Island.

National

Machinery & Products

 

 

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

True Reflection?

A fair question has been raised about how member-funded organisations should conduct themselves when taking a public position on any…

Civil Circus!

OPINION: It really is getting harder to lampoon government bureaucrats when they do such a good job of it themselves.…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter