Thursday, 04 April 2013 15:52

Editorial - Dry arguments ring hollow

Written by 

AS MORE regions are declared drought zones farmers can only despair of ill-informed comment – mainly by non-farmers and big-city media – showing up the rural/urban divide. It’s a chasm. 

 

For example, Primary Industries Minister Nathan Guy was criticised for not rushing home from an overseas trade mission because the drought was the worst in 70 years. (Guy and and primary industries boss Wayne McNee were on a 10-day trade mission to South America with the Prime Minister and business leaders). 

Speaking in Sao Paulo, Brazil, after a Fonterra-hosted event, Guy said,  “I can’t make it rain... this is a very important trip. We are opening some doors here… getting our products into these markets.”

Those critics should have been able to see the greater value of the minister forging relationships with those countries than performing mock rain dances back in Wellington! 

Guy pointed out that the way for the Government to truly make a difference to drought-affected farmers is to get busy on irrigation. “We haven’t got a water shortage issue; rain falls in huge volumes. What we have is a storage issue. We need to capture and store water more efficiently.” 

But the opposition to such proposals as the Ruataniwha dam in Hawkes Bay and similar projects in Canterbury show how difficult this will be. The Greens and eco-fundamentalist groups have drawn swords.

Then there are the snide comments – chiefly letters to city newspapers and radio talkback – about how much cash help farmers are getting. These sometimes go along with bellyaching about farmers getting welfare while shoppers pay dearly for milk and meat. Few city dwellers would know – as Fed Farmers chief Bruce Wills points out – that farm advisory and counselling services are delivered mostly by Rural Support Trust chapters.   

Says Wills, “An official declaration [of drought] tells the banks how bad things are. It also gives Inland Revenue discretion on things like income equalisation, but farmers are not excused any tax obligations.” 

Wills adds that ‘rural assistance payments’ are for genuine hardship, granted only after testing of an applicant’s farm and off-farm income. “In January 2011, during the last major drought, fewer than 100 farmers out of some 25,000 commercial pastoral farms qualified.”

Let’s hope rain falls soon where it is needed, relieving us from drought and ill-informed critics.

More like this

Editorial: Agri's mojo is back

OPINION: Good times are coming back for the primary industries. From sentiment expressed at Fieldays to the latest rural confidence survey results, all indicate farmer confidence at a near-record high.

Editorial: Sense at last

OPINION: For the first time in many years, a commonsense approach is emerging to balance environmental issues with the need for the nation's primary producers to be able to operate effectively.

Editorial: Time for common sense

OPINION: The case of four Canterbury high country stations facing costly and complex consent hearing processes highlights the dilemma facing the farming sector as the country transitions into a replacement for the Resource Management Act (RMA).

Editorial: KiwiSaver to the rescue?

OPINION: Farmers are rightly urging the Government to relax the rules around KiwiSaver and allow young farmers to use their savings towards purchasing either a house, cows or a farm.

Featured

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Overbearing?

OPINION: Dust ups between rural media and PR types aren't unheard of but also aren't common, given part of the…

Foot-in-mouth

OPINION: The Hound hears from his canine pals in Southland that an individual's derogatory remarks on social media have left…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter