Tuesday, 03 November 2020 05:55

Red rag to a bull?

Written by  Peter Burke
Federated Farmers president Andrew Hoggard. Federated Farmers president Andrew Hoggard.

Will Labour alone be easier to deal with?

That is the question lobby groups, including Federated Farmers, are pondering following Labour’s landslide victory at the election.

Federated Farmers president Andrew Hoggard says, in terms of overall policy, he believes there will be little difference to what occurred during the past three years. He points to the fact that two major pieces of legislation relating to healthy waterway and Zero Carbon are both creating challenges for farmers.

“I guess it’s going to come in terms of the healthy waterways as to how that is implemented and what further changes are made,” Hoggard told Rural News

“Hopefully, we might see it modified to be a little bit more practical and a little less paint by numbers, from a national perspective, and allow for some regional flexibility catchment by catchment.”

Hoggard says David Parker, who is responsible for the healthy waterways bill, is not on the Christmas card list of many farmers. He says it’s hard to say if Parker were replaced as Minister for Environment whether the legislation would change much.

“But if he was removed from the portfolio it could certainly change farmers’ perceptions.” 

Hoggard says having to deal with just one party will be easier for Feds. He says, in the past, it’s been noticeable that every small party had its own internal games and different angles on a subject and getting support was at times difficult and frustrating.

“Around climate change, for example, NZ First gave us a nod and wink that they would push forward an idea of ours. So, we took it up with Labour and Greens and they said yes – and so did National. But then NZ First said no because they wouldn’t have anything to do with National. It was very annoying.” 

A much talked about issue is whether farmers, many of whom traditionally support National, actually voted Labour to keep the Greens out of any coalition. Hoggard says he has yet to meet a long time National voter who claims to have done this, but he’s sure there is some truth in the story.

“You can see the strategy behind that, given the Green’s plans for agriculture were a helluva lot more extreme than all the other parties had proposed.” 

More like this

Picking winners?

OPINION: Every time politicians come up with an investment scheme where they're going to have a crack at 'picking winners' with our money, the Hound cringes.

Working with farmers to ensure best outcomes

OPINION: Recent media commentary from Southland Federated Farmers has raised concerns among our rural communities, particularly around Environment Southland’s approach to winter grazing inspections and nitrogen reporting. But let’s be clear, much of what’s been said simply doesn’t reflect reality.

Featured

Big day at Clash of the Colleges

Craighead Diocesan, Darfield High School and Christchurch Boys' High School took out the three age groups at the Canterbury Clash of the Colleges, which was held at the recent Ashburton A&P Show.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Sugar hit

OPINION: Winston Peters has described the decision to sell its brand to Lactalis and disperse the profit to its farmer…

Wrong focus?

OPINION: The Hound reckons a big problem with focusing too much on the wrong goal - reducing livestock emissions at…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter