Thursday, 28 November 2013 15:46

Nutrient limits lift paperwork burden

Written by 

NEVER MIND the limits, it's the paperwork that's the real threat in regional council moves to cut nutrient losses and meet central Government's National Policy Statement on Freshwater Quality, cropping farmers have been told.

 

That was one of three "slightly controversial" points Roger Williams of the Foundation of Arable Research presented to growers at FAR's South Canterbury and North Otago trials hub field day.

Compared to dairy farms, cropping systems are hugely complex and data intensive and, as some at the field day confirmed, inputting data into Overseer as required by regional plans can take days.

And that's assuming they have all the records for nutrient inputs to hand, added Williams.

"Probably the take home message is that if you've not already got good, robust records, particularly for nutrient use on farm, get them sorted out."

But for all that, Overseer is "the only tool we've got" and a "pretty good starting point" for managing nutrient inputs and outputs, he argued.

"It's actually a pretty clever bit of software.... If we systematically undermine the credibility of Overseer as a tool we could never use I think we could find ourselves in a bad spot pretty quickly."

Another of Williams' points was that in practice, input and output limits amount to much the same thing. Why? Because nutrient losses, ie outputs, can't be measured in practice on farm, meaning the industry has to rely on modelling to predict the losses based on the inputs.

FAR has been working hard to debunk "a bizarre mythology among regional council that cropping systems are leaky systems," Williams said.

In practice, growers closely match nutrient inputs to crop off-take so the only area where losses rise above proposed limits is where cows are wintered.

"The great thing with cropping is there's not an unfortunate linkage between productivity and losses."

Featured

Big return on a small investment

Managing director of Woolover Ltd, David Brown, has put a lot of effort into verifying what seems intuitive, that keeping newborn stock's core temperature stable pays dividends by helping them realise their full genetic potential.

Editorial: Sensible move

OPINION: The Government's decision to rule out changes to Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) that would cost every farmer thousands of dollars annually, is sensible.

National

Machinery & Products

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Overbearing?

OPINION: Dust ups between rural media and PR types aren't unheard of but also aren't common, given part of the…

Foot-in-mouth

OPINION: The Hound hears from his canine pals in Southland that an individual's derogatory remarks on social media have left…

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter