Monday, 31 October 2022 15:55

'Forestry hysteria' not helpful - forest owners

Written by  Staff Reporters
The New Zealand Farm Forestry Association says recent comments from Beef + Lamb NZ and Federated Farmers are adding to alarm and hysteria around the issue of forestry offsets. The New Zealand Farm Forestry Association says recent comments from Beef + Lamb NZ and Federated Farmers are adding to alarm and hysteria around the issue of forestry offsets.

The New Zealand Farm Forestry Association says that recent comments from Beef + Lamb NZ (B + LNZ) and Federated Farmers are adding to alarm and hysteria around forestry.

The comments come in the aftermath of a Curia poll which found 54% of Kiwis supported a limit on the amount of fossil fuel emissions that can be offset with new pine forests.

“Picking selective facts from surveys they commissioned is building a narrative that suits their political purposes and deflects from the real issues,” says Graham West, president of the New Zealand Farm Forestry Association.

West says that asking whether people support a limit to forestry offsets or whether there is concern around the conversion of farms to forests to meet climate change, only address part of the issue.

“Both avoid the obvious question, ‘What alternatives do you prefer?’,” he says, adding that a more relevant question might be something along the lines of ‘What global temperature increase is acceptable before we start using land use change as a method of cooling the planet?’

West also points out that B + LNZ’s statistics on the number of hectares of farmland sold for forestry in 2021 are flawed.

“They ignore that 2,292 was to Manuka interests, and only 19,717 was for carbon forestry.”

He says that B + LNZ fails to give the numbers context.

“The total of whole farms sold to forestry interests that year was less than 0.5% of the area in pastoral farming,” West says.

“Farming’s leadership should be addressing the lack of progress in reducing global warming instead of deflecting public awareness on to the issue of a relatively small area being sold to forestry interests.

“Current flooding, droughts, and windstorms indicate climate change will destroy rural economies at significant scale unless tree crops are used to provide financial and environmental buffering. We need a better-informed debate than this,” West says.

More like this

Rain misses Taranaki region

The 'atmospheric river' of rain that swept down the country last week almost completely avoided one of the worst drought-affected regions in the country – coastal Taranaki.

Should've waited

OPINION: The proposed RMA reforms took a while to drop but were well signaled after the election.

Featured

Farmers urged not to be complacent about TB

New Zealand's TBfree programme has made great progress in reducing the impact of the disease on livestock herds, but there’s still a long way to go, according to Beef+Lamb NZ.

Editorial: Making wool great again

OPINION: Otago farmer and NZ First MP Mark Patterson is humble about the role that he’s played in mandating government agencies to use wool wherever possible in new and refurbished buildings.

National

Machinery & Products

Farmer-led group buys Novag

While the name and technology remain unchanged and new machines will continue to carry the Novag name, all the assets,…

Buhler name to go

Shareholders at a special meeting have approved a proposed deal that will see Buhler Industries, the publicly traded Versatile and…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Make it 1000%!

OPINION: The appendage swinging contest between the US and China continues, with China hitting back with a new rate of…

Own goal

OPINION: The irony of President Trump’s tariff obsession is that the worst damage may be done to his own people.

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter