Wednesday, 06 September 2017 08:55

Farmers have heads in sand - Labour

Written by  Pam Tipa
Damien O’Connor. Damien O’Connor.

The farming sector has its head in the sand if it doesn’t realise water is a huge issue waiting to be tackled, says Labour’s primary industries spokesperson Damien O’Connor.

If agricultural organisations like HortNZ or IrrigationNZ “are smart they will show leadership on this issue; if they are dumb, they won’t”, he told Rural News.

“This simply [requires] a user-pays regime where we need to spend money to clean up waterways, to better monitor what is happening with our water management systems and waterways and for more research.”

O’Connor says user-pays, as a principle, has long been acceptable to farmers, but the water issue has been largely ignored for a long time.

“All you have to do is refer to John Luxton’s (former DairyNZ chairman) opinion that for the dairy industry in particular the social licence to operate is quickly evaporating. The industry needs to get ahead of a number of issues.

“A royalty on water would effectively provide funding for storage where it is viable, and for irrigation, better monitoring, research and development and better monitoring of regulations and standards,” O’Connor claims.

“If we don’t do this properly our customers will be rejecting our product. We have to produce the finest, most ethically and sustainably produced products in the world and get a premium for them otherwise our future is not too bright.”

He says a ‘royalty’ would be applied to all commercial use of water except that coming via reticulated supply. However urban and industrial clean-up of waterways are “just as necessary and need to be proceeded with”.

Urban people would also pay for water clean-ups of sewage and stormwater systems, but through a different mechanism, he says.

In rural areas charges wouldn’t be made for stock water but further details “have to be worked through”.

That’s why Labour plans a round-table discussion if elected “because in different parts of New Zealand there are different degrees of reliance on water and different impacts on waterways, as pointed out by Federated Farmers”.

O’Connor also claims that Labour, in Opposition, has not had the resources required to analyse the details sufficiently and properly. He says this is why it is waiting – pending the resources of Government – to establish the finer details of any proposal.

He says if Labour was forced into the detail now it may not be accurate and fair.

“We want to be accurate and fair so that what we implement is workable and people can see it is logical.”

More like this

IrrigationNZ warns RMA reform may miss water needs

Irrigation NZ is warning that the government's Resource Management Act (RMA) reform risks falling short of its objectives unless water use for food production and water storage infrastructure are clearly recognised in the goals at the top of the new system.

Featured

National

Machinery & Products

Mark Dillon Does It Again!

Southland crop farmer Mark Dillon took out his fifth New Zealand conventional ploughing title at the NZ Ploughing Championships held…

Chinese Tractors Eye Western Europe

Having caused quite a stir at last year’s Agritechnica, Chinese manufacturer Zoomlion is reported to be conducting large-scale field trials…

» Latest Print Issues Online

The Hound

Bouquets

OPINION: Bouquets this week from the old mutt for Fed Farmers and Groundswell for continuing to resist the proposed Gore…

Waffle Man

OPINION: In what world does old mate Christopher Luxon live?

» Connect with Rural News

» eNewsletter

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter