One and One Don't Make Three
OPINION: Since when did one and one make three? Who didn't smell an elephant-sized rat when our leaders decided to give $60 million to save the cement factory in Northland?
If they are voted back into power at the next general election, farmers can expect much tougher rules around nutrient management.
This includes the phasing out of synthetic fertiliser usage on farm and reduced stocking rates around catchments.
The strategy proposed by the Greens includes a drinking water regulator empowered to monitor, report on and enforce protections for water sources.
The strategy includes setting science-based national standards for freshwater, lowering the current nitrate limit for drinking water, and entirely phasing out synthetic nitrogen fertiliser.
Stocking rates would also be reduced on a catchment-by-catchment basis to improve water quality and river health.
But as ACT MP Andrew Hoggard points out, banning synthetic fertiliser would drive up the price of everyday food at the checkout and slash New Zealand’s export income.
When the Greens talk about getting rid of synthetic fertiliser, they seem to think farmers use the stuff for fun.
It’s bloody expensive, but it’s also essential for growing the food New Zealand families rely on, Hoggard points out.
Improving freshwater outcomes requires practical solutions, not blanket bans from Wellington. Farmers up and down the country are already doing great work protecting waterways.
The best approach is for each farmer to understand the risks on their own farm, put practical mitigations in place, and work alongside their neighbours on catchment plans.
That’s how we improve water quality while keeping farms productive.
As Hoggard says, it’s a lot smarter than banning the tools that help feed the world.
