$2.4m for fruit fly operation
Biosecurity New Zealand Commissioner, North, Mike Inglis says the $2.4 million cost of a recent biosecurity operation in South Auckland is small compared to the potential economic impact of an incursion.
While I know I have written about this situation in the past, I feel it is worthwhile writing about it again because, as the saying goes, “Your perception may not be my reality”.
It is hard to get meetings with Ministers and their officials. However, those meetings are of critical importance to improving their understanding. We were recently criticised during one meeting for putting something too simply. However, our simple explanation led to the Minister realising that what was being proposed was potentially flawed and could result in unintended outcomes. As a result, the Minister decided to take action with his colleagues, which we hope will result in a better outcome for our industry and the wider NZ community
As an industry, we always offer immersion experiences for officials to grow and build on their knowledge base. We are a complex and variable sector with 20 product groups. We are definitely not all the same. Growing asparagus, for example, is quite different to growing kiwifruit. By exposing officials to the diverse and complex nature of our industry we hope to build a more understanding and collaborative relationship where government begins to consider the specific needs of those within our sector as part of their decision making.
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) is standing up a new farm advisory service but is yet to clarify what that group will look like and how it will deliver. At the same time, another part of the Government has provided our sector with funding to stand up an advisory service too. Groups such as Dairy NZ and Beef + Lamb also offer advisory services.
To make this a positive rather than negative addition, it will be important that industry and MPI work collaboratively to plan for and manage these advisory services.
We know our industry is a challenge to understand because of its diversity.
There has been talk about automation and robotics, and how the Government believes they are going to solve our industry’s labour issues. Somehow, our industry is ‘bad’ because automation and robotics are not already solving those issues.
Put simply, the current situation is this – at least in the apple industry: Self-propelled platforms that go up and down and espaliering the trees to grow in two dimensions increases the number of people who can do apple picking work but it does not increase productivity, as the Government seems to believe.
The optical technology that is needed for a robot to be able to pick an apple is still a long way off being fully developed let alone reaching commercialisation. What’s more, given current uncertainties with some growers removing apple trees and not replacing them, very few growers would be in a position to make the significant financial investment required, even if the technology was available and had been commercialised.
‘Dear Government. Please come and visit and look, listen and learn. That way you will get the productive food and fibre sector that you are after and need to deliver on New Zealand’s environmental commitments and economic recovery.’
Nadine Tunley is chief executive of Hort NZ.
