increase font size
Jamie McFadden
OPINION: Having attended the webinars, meetings and reading the information, I am none the wiser as to why the world's most emissions efficient farmers are being taxed for emissions and by how much.
It defies logic for a government to implement policies that will reduce the amount of food producing land in a country that is leading the world in sustainable food production.
Recently the Government decided to put agriculture into the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) and farmers would pay an emissions tax. However, our industry leaders offered to partner with the Government to find a nicer way than the ETS to emissions tax farmers. Thus, the He Waka Eke Noa (HWEN) partnership was born.
The purpose of HWEN is unclear. If the aim was to reduce global emissions, then a blunt tax on NZ farmers would not see the light of day. The official HWEN consultation material states that all three emissions tax options (including the ETS) will have a less than 1% impact on reducing emissions and this is not even taking all farmers into account.
The publicity also states the purpose of HWEN was to come up with an emissions tax option that was better than the ETS. Seems it is nothing to do with being visionary, achieving environmental outcomes or effective, efficient policy - it is mainly about how to emissions tax farmers in the nicest way possible.
This would explain the sales pitch, which was to make farmers so fearful of the dreaded ETS that they would choose an almost equally flawed option simply on the grounds of it being sold as less repugnant.
To seal the HWEN emissions tax deal, some sweeteners have been thrown in.
The first is that the two HWEN options allow farming representatives to be at the "advisory board" table with the Government. It is unclear how the advisory body would be appointed and how decisions would be made.
There is no guarantee that the HWEN options are any safer from government dictate than the ETS. The problem with this "we must be at the table" thinking is that farmers are always on the menu.
If we look back on the last few years, the biggest turnaround we got from the Government was when Southland Federated Farmers stepped away from the table on Freshwater winter grazing rules and called for farmers to not apply for consents. There is a lesson here and it is naïve to think that always being at the table is the most effective approach.
The second sweetener is the promise of sequestration credits. However, these have been massively overstated. For example, native forest existing prior to 2008, farmers can only claim for the additional sequestration resulting from 'active management'. Imagine the bean counters trying work that one out - at cost to the farmer.
In another example, virtually none of the hundreds of riparian native planting projects we have undertaken for farmers over the past 20 years are eligible for HWEN credits.
In summary, I don't ever recall in my 25 years of submission processes not knowing what a proposal was going to cost me.
There is no cost benefit or economic analysis, and we have no idea what the administration cost to farmers will be.
What is the solution? I am part of the Groundswell team who are developing a new approach to environmental issues. We are seeking a focus on environmental outcome and actions on the ground tailored to each individual farm and catchment. Our proposal takes an integrated approach to addressing all environmental issues, including emissions.
Much of what we are proposing is reflective of the direction of the many catchment and landcare groups, and individual effort already happening on the ground.
We encourage everyone to lobby politicians and industry leaders to advocate for practical, workable policies rather than acceding to government dictates. One thing is clear - if the goal is environmental outcomes and reducing global emissions, then there is no place for the current HWEN or ETS emissions tax options.
Jamie McFadden chairman of North Canterbury based Rural Advocacy Network and spokesman for Groundswell.
Beef + Lamb New Zealand (BLNZ) says the release of New Zealand's latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory clearly shows agriculture is playing its part in emissions reductions and there is no need for a price on agricultural emissions.
Federated Farmers president Wayne Langford says the Government’s recently released emissions pricing plan is ‘tone-deaf’.
Fonterra is splashing out $700 million to improve its manufacturing operations and supply chain emissions footprint.
Rural lobby group Groundswell NZ says biodiversity will be the biggest loser if the Government's new biodiversity legislation is passed.
OPINION: Why do our rural industry group leaders (Beef+Lamb & DairyNZ), continue to mislead farmers over sequestration credits?
On the eve of his departure from Federated Farmers board, Richard McIntyre is thanking farmers for their support and words of encouragement during his stint as a farmer advocate.
A project reducing strains and sprains on farm has won the Innovation category in the New Zealand Workplace Health and Safety Awards 2025.
Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ), in partnership with the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and other sector organisations, has launched a national survey to understand better the impact of facial eczema (FE) on farmers.
One of New Zealand's latest and largest agrivoltaics farm Te Herenga o Te Rā is delivering clean renewable energy while preserving the land's agricultural value for sheep grazing under the modules.
Global food company Nestle’s chair Paul Bulcke will step down at its next annual meeting in April 2026.
Brendan Attrill of Caiseal Trust in Taranaki has been announced as the 2025 National Ambassador for Sustainable Farming and Growing and recipient of the Gordon Stephenson Trophy at the National Sustainability Showcase at in Wellington this evening.
